Search

How can we help?

Icon

Urgent procurement in a pandemic

Depending on the value and size of the contract, a typical procurement run in accordance with the requirements of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 can take anything from a few months to more than a year to conclude.

Regulation 32(2)(c) does however provide an exception for contracts which are required for reasons of extreme urgency brought about by events unforeseeable by the contracting authority. Where this exception applies and it is not possible for the time limits for the open, restricted or competitive negotiation procedures to be used as a result of that urgency, a public body may award a contract using the negotiated procedure without advertising it and following the usual procurement processes.

Depending on the value and size of the contract, a typical procurement run in accordance with the requirements of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 can take anything from a few months to more than a year to conclude.

The COVID-19 pandemic was unprecedented and many contracting authorities have, since March 2020, relied on the Regulation 32(2)(c) exception to award urgent pandemic-related contracts without running a full regulated tender. Providing the conditions of Regulation 32 are met, this is permitted. However, contracting authorities need to be very careful to ensure that they do not abuse the Regulation 32(2)(c) exception, the requirements of which are as follows:

  1. There is extreme urgency;
  2. The extreme urgency has been brought about by events which were unforeseeable by the contracting authority;
  3. The time limits for regulated tenders cannot be complied with;
  4. The extreme urgency is not attributable in any way to the contracting authority.

In addition, contracts may only be awarded insofar as they are strictly necessary.

During the course of the pandemic, contracting authorities have relied on Regulation 32(2)(c) to award a large number of contracts worth many billions of pounds, including in particular contracts for the supply of PPE and for lab testing. Both the size and scale of these direct awards, and the process adopted by contracting authorities in awarding them, have been subject to media scrutiny and, in some cases, legal challenge by bidders.

Whilst it may be legitimate for contracting authorities to use Regulation 32(2)(c) in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, contracting authorities must be careful to ensure that their decisions are properly documented; that the contracts awarded do not go further than strictly necessary; and the process adopted complies with general EU Treaty principles of equality, transparency and proportionality. Contracting authorities should also be aware that as the pandemic continues, reliance on Regulation 32(2)(c) will become more difficult as the effects of the virus can no longer be described as unforeseeable.

On the other side of the coin, bidders should keep under review the contracts directly awarded by contracting authorities, which must be published on Contracts Finder and in OJEU, currently, and post-Brexit on the new UK Find a Tender service, which will go live on 1 January 2021. If bidders feel they have missed out on a valuable opportunity, they should take early legal advice in order to determine whether they may have any grounds for challenging a direct award.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 11 December 2017
  • Commercial Real Estate

Is the Local Pub Becoming a More Attractive Commercial Option?

The slow decline of the local has been well publicised in recent years; exacerbated by the price of your pint in the pub remaining high compared with supermarket beer and food sold in pubs being subject to VAT, while food sold in supermarkets is not.

art
  • 07 December 2017
  • Employment

Monica Atwal comments on the harassment backlash against women in the workplace

Facebook’s CEO Sheryl Sandberg took to Facebook to speak out about harassment in the workplace towards women.

art
  • 06 December 2017
  • Construction

Architect negligent because of client’s budget

A decision in October 2017 looked at whether the standard RIBA scope of services meant that an architect was required to ascertain and comply with a client’s budget when designing a project: Riva Properties Limited v Foster + Partners Limited EWHC 2574.

art
  • 04 December 2017
  • Employment

Does government face ‘steep learning curve’ on apprenticeships?

As reported previously, in April this year the apprenticeship levy came into force. This introduced a 0.5% levy on employers with payrolls over £3million.

art
  • 30 November 2017
  • Employment

Monica Atwal comments in the Raconteur on ‘Want to know how much colleagues are paid?’

Monica Atwal comments in the Raconteur on ‘Want to know how much colleagues are paid?’Whether or not individuals’ pay should be made public is a matter of controversy.

art
  • 30 November 2017
  • Employment

Closing Report from 2017 UN Forum on Business and Human Rights

Michael Sippitt, Chairman of Clarkslegal and the Commonwealth Environmental Investment Platform, reports from the closing day of the UN Forum on Business and Human Rights in Geneva.