Search

How can we help?

Icon

Statutory redundancy pay was not caught by the £25,000 breach of contract cap

In Uradar v Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust, the Claimant was made redundant and had a contractual redundancy entitlement of £43,949.04. The Trust refused to pay, claiming she had turned down suitable alternative employment.

A provision in the Claimant’s contract stated this entitlement was inclusive of statutory redundancy pay, in her case calculated at £5,868.00. The contractual redundancy pay therefore totalled £38,071.04.

When the Claimant brought her case to the ET, they awarded her £25,000, which is the current cap on breach of contract claims and held the cap also caught her statutory redundancy pay.

On appeal to the EAT, the Claimant won £25,000 for non-payment of the contractual redundancy pay, and £5,868.00 for non-payment of her statutory redundancy pay.

The EAT held that the employer had two obligations to the Claimant; one in contract and one in statute, and that the award should be reflective of both. They clarified the cap only applied to a breach of contract claim and did not impact her statutory claim.

Employers with contractual redundancy schemes should therefore be aware that the cap of £25,000 only applies to contractual redundancy pay and does not extend to the amount owed to employees under statute.

The cap of £25,000 only applies to contractual redundancy pay and does not extend to the amount owed to employees under statute.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 15 October 2026

Clarkslegal celebrates continued success in Chambers and Partners UK 2027

Clarkslegal is delighted to announce that we have once again been recognised by Chambers and Partners UK 2027, celebrating continued success across the firm and a number of enhanced individual rankings.

Pub
  • 15 October 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Data breaches and ICO investigations: Responding with confidence

In this podcast Harry Berryman and Zahra Navarro discuss recent ICO enforcement action, common causes of data breaches, and the practical steps organisations should take to respond effectively when incidents occur.

art
  • 14 October 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

London Court of International Arbitration v International Chamber of Commerce: Key differences

Compare LCIA and ICC arbitration rules, costs, confidentiality provisions and expedited procedures. Learn the key differences between these leading international arbitration institutions and how to choose the right option for your commercial dispute.

art
  • 09 October 2026
  • Employment

Neurodiversity, probation and unfair dismissal: What employers need to know

The next few years are introducing landmark changes to employment law in the UK, under the Employment Rights Act 2025. Part of these changes include the amendments to rights to unfair dismissal, reducing the qualifying period for this right to six months.

art
  • 08 October 2026
  • Commercial Real Estate

Packing up rate mitigation – The end of ‘box shifting’?

What is box shifting and how does it affect property owners and tenants? We examine the Court of Appeal’s decision in City of London v 48th Street Holdings and its implications for intermittent occupation, business rates and lease arrangements.

art
  • 30 September 2026

Clarkslegal celebrates strong results in the Legal 500 UK 2027

Clarkslegal would like to thank its clients for the outstanding feedback that contributed to the firm’s recognition in the Legal 500 UK Solicitors 2027 Guide. We are proud to be recognised across five key practice areas: Litigation, Property, Corporate & Commercial, Employment, and Immigration.