Search

How can we help?

Icon

Driver subjected to sexual advances and biased grievance process was constructively dismissed

A female driver who was sexually harassed by her manager and supervisor has won her claim for constructive unfair dismissal.

The driver was harassed from the date of her interview for the role, with the manager taking her phone number from her application and making sexual advances on numerous occasions. She was also moved to another depot so the supervisor there could continue to encourage her manager’s advances.

Following her rebuffs, the manager made a complaint about her “poor attitude” just before the driver put in a formal grievance. The manager investigating the grievance was ill-prepared and was familiar with her manager, and concluded the conduct was neither harassment nor bullying and may have been welcomed. The driver’s appeal was not upheld, and she resigned.

A female driver who was sexually harassed by her manager and supervisor has won her claim for constructive unfair dismissal.

The Tribunal held that the conduct was clearly unwanted and amounted to a clear breach of trust and confidence, as did the employer’s treatment of her grievance. The Tribunal was particularly critical of those who conducted the grievance and appeal due to their lack of impartiality and their pre-determined opinions.

This case is a reminder to employers to ensure that grievances of this nature are investigated by a member of staff who has both the appropriate training and independence to do so.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 07 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Accelerating arbitration: Expedited procedures and key changes in the new ICC Rules – Episode 2

In episode 2, Jack Hobbs (Clarkslegal) and Christopher Howitt (Three Stone) explore how the latest expedited and highly expedited procedures under the ICC Arbitration Rules 2026 are transforming the landscape of dispute resolution.

art
  • 07 July 2026
  • Employment

6 month unfair dismissal rights: What employers need to know

Under the new Employment Rights Act 2025 the minimum period of service required to qualify to bring a statutory claim for unfair dismissal has been reduced from 2 full years to 6 months from 1 January 2027 onwards.  

art
  • 02 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Litigation and Artificial Intelligence: Where are we now?

In the recent case of Cork and another v Smith, the High Court publicly admonished a law firm and two of its solicitors after they had produced and submitted two AI-generated letters to the court containing misleading and false information in relation to a block transfer application made under Rule 12.37 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016.

Pub
  • 30 June 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Overview of the new ICC Arbitration Rules: Key changes – Episode 1

In this episode, Jack Hobbs (Clarkslegal) and Christopher Howitt (Three Stone) discuss the major updates in the ICC Arbitration Rules 2026 and what they mean for practitioners, clients, and the future of international arbitration.

art
  • 26 June 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Exit Readiness Consultation: Prepare your business for a successful sale

Take the first step toward a smoother, more profitable business exit. Our Exit Readiness service provides tailored health checks, expert guidance, and a free initial consultation—helping you address potential issues early and maximise your sale value.

art
  • 25 June 2026
  • Immigration

Justice and Home Affairs Committee – Settlement, Citizenship and Integration: What the House of Lords Report Means for Migrants

Discover how the House of Lords report influences UK settlement, citizenship, and integration policies. Learn what it means for migrants and employers.