Search

How can we help?

Icon

Amanda Glover comments on ‘incorrect communication resulted in colleague’s ‘near miss’ with a train was unfairly dismissed’

A railway firm team leader with controller of site safety status was unfairly dismissed after he incorrectly communicated a line blockage, resulting in a near “fatal” miss with a train, a tribunal has ruled.

The Newcastle Employment Tribunal found that while Network Rail Infrastructure (NRI) had reasonable grounds to view Mr C Boxall’s actions as misconduct, the almost two-year delay in his eventual dismissal was “wholly unacceptable and made the investigation wholly unreasonable”.

However, it also found that Boxall – while not entirely “blameworthy or culpable” – did contribute to his dismissal and his award was reduced by 25 per cent.

In People Management, Amanda Glover, Associate at Clarkslegal comments that despite the seriousness of the incident in question, and the tribunal’s acceptance that the employee had committed an act of misconduct – both of which appear like reasonable causes for dismissal – “an employer’s procedural ‘mishaps’ can ultimately lead to a finding of unfair dismissal”.

The mishaps in this case include the largely unexplained delays in the investigation process and the employer’s failure to follow its own disciplinary procedure fully, Glover explained.

“In terms of the substantive mishap, the tribunal found that the dismissal was not a reasonable response in the circumstances of this case,” she added. “The employer had failed to consider alternative sanctions or take into account the substantial mitigation both in respect of the personal stress the claimant was under at the time and his clean disciplinary record and period of service.”

Read the full article: People Management

Judge says two-year delay in proceedings was ‘wholly unacceptable’, but employee’s misconduct contributed to his dismissal

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 29 April 2026
  • Employment

Employment Rights Act: Changing key contract terms will be harder from January 2027

The Employment Rights Act 2025 (“ERA 2025”) introduces a new regime that restricts how employers can change certain core contractual terms, with the key provisions now expected to commence on 1 January 2027.

art
  • 14 April 2026
  • Employment

Updates to Vento Bands 2026: Injury to feelings awards

For discrimination and detriment cases, compensation can also cover non-financial losses, which, in most cases, will include an injury to feelings award.

art
  • 09 April 2026
  • Employment

Bereaved Partner’s Paternity Leave: the new statutory right explained

The new statutory right is not inconsequential, and so to ensure that everyone is up to date: here is what you need to know about this new right.

art
  • 30 March 2026
  • Employment

Legislative Changes – What Employers Need to Know for April 2026

With the phased implementation of the Employment Rights Act 2025 (ERA), alongside other legislative updates, April 2026 brings a wide range of important changes for employers.

art
  • 16 March 2026
  • Employment

Trade Union Law Changes from April 2026

April brings the next tranche of reforms under the Employment Rights Act 2025 including changes to the statutory recognition scheme making it easier for trade unions to be recognised in the workplace.

art
  • 13 March 2026
  • Employment

When Immigration compliance becomes discrimination: The UK’s uncomfortable workplace balance

UK employers today operate under powerful, and some may say conflicting, legal pressures. On one hand, they must prevent illegal working under UK immigration laws.