Search

How can we help?

Icon

Unofficial work before start date not counted towards continuous employment

In O’Sullivan v DSM Demolition Ltd, the Claimant’s contract of employment recorded a start date of 2 November 2015, and he first appeared on the Respondent’s payroll and worksheets from this date.

However, the Claimant had completed some work for the Respondent in the week commencing 26 October 2015 and received £100 cash in hand from an employee of the Respondent for this work.

Following his dismissal on 27 October 2017, the Claimant alleged he had been unfairly dismissed, but it was held that he did not have sufficient service to bring the claim.

The Claimant appealed on the grounds that his employment had started on 26 October 2015, not 2 November 2015 as the ET had found.

This case highlights the importance of a clear start date when bringing claims to the ET.

The EAT dismissed the Claimant’s appeal and held that the ET had been entitled to find the work performed in the week of 26 October was “unofficial”, based on the documentary evidence above, the fact the Claimant was not paid the £12/hour rate for this work, and the fact the Respondent’s client had not been charged for the Claimant’s work in that week.

This case highlights the importance of a clear start date when bringing claims to the ET.   It is important to be aware that employers agreeing to ‘off the books’ working without tax and national insurance properly deducted and paid risk very substantial penalties.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 08 July 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

ICO prosecutes employee under the Data Protection Act for forwarding client data to his personal email address

The issue of employees taking confidential business information or personal data when moving to a new employer remains a significant concern for businesses.

Pub
  • 07 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Accelerating arbitration: Expedited procedures and key changes in the new ICC Rules – Episode 2

In episode 2, Jack Hobbs (Clarkslegal) and Christopher Howitt (Three Stone) explore how the latest expedited and highly expedited procedures under the ICC Arbitration Rules 2026 are transforming the landscape of dispute resolution.

art
  • 07 July 2026
  • Employment

6 month unfair dismissal rights: What employers need to know

Under the new Employment Rights Act 2025 the minimum period of service required to qualify to bring a statutory claim for unfair dismissal has been reduced from 2 full years to 6 months from 1 January 2027 onwards.  

art
  • 02 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Litigation and Artificial Intelligence: Where are we now?

In the recent case of Cork and another v Smith, the High Court publicly admonished a law firm and two of its solicitors after they had produced and submitted two AI-generated letters to the court containing misleading and false information in relation to a block transfer application made under Rule 12.37 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016.

Pub
  • 30 June 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Overview of the new ICC Arbitration Rules: Key changes – Episode 1

In this episode, Jack Hobbs (Clarkslegal) and Christopher Howitt (Three Stone) discuss the major updates in the ICC Arbitration Rules 2026 and what they mean for practitioners, clients, and the future of international arbitration.

art
  • 26 June 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Exit Readiness Consultation: Prepare your business for a successful sale

Take the first step toward a smoother, more profitable business exit. Our Exit Readiness service provides tailored health checks, expert guidance, and a free initial consultation—helping you address potential issues early and maximise your sale value.