Search

How can we help?

Icon

The right to disconnect 

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has meant that, for many people, the boundary between work and home life has become blurred. A vast amount of people were suddenly required to work from home which meant for many, homes became offices and this has resulted in many struggling to disconnect from work outside of their working hours. 

Even as we move beyond the pandemic, it seems likely that home working will now be a part of the ‘new normal’ and with many businesses taking steps to transition to a new hybrid way of working, these issues are unlikely to disappear. With this in mind, as employers have a duty to protect the health and safety of employees, they should be taking care to consider how employees can be supported with their ‘right to disconnect’. 

What is the right to disconnect? 

The ‘right to disconnect’ would ensure all employees have a right to not have to work outside their normal agreed hours and not have to engage in any work-related communications including emails, telephone calls, instant messaging etc. 

Other countries have taken different approaches on how to implement the right to disconnect and for some, action had been taken long before the pandemic began. For example, France, Italy and Spain have all introduced legislation which grants workers the right to not have to respond to work-related communications outside their working hours and protects them from being penalised for this. Ireland have approached the issue by introducing a legislative code focusing on three key rights: 

  • Workers are entitled to not perform work or attend work matters outside their normal working hours; 
  • Workers have a right not to suffer a detriment to refuse to work outside their normal working hours; and 
  • Both workers and employers have a duty to respect their colleagues right to disconnect which includes not responding to emails when they aren’t working. 

However, it is appreciated that it is difficult to introduce legislation which provides clear rules to protect employees but also allows for flexibility for businesses with hybrid workers. 

Even as we move beyond the pandemic, it seems likely that home working will now be a part of the ‘new normal’ and with many businesses taking steps to transition to a new hybrid way of working. 

How can employers support an employee’s right to disconnect? 

The UK government are yet to announce whether they intend to introduce any laws or regulations which focus on the ‘right to disconnect’. However, this right could be of benefit to both employees and businesses as establishing an effective work-life balance is crucial in avoiding burn-out and maximising productivity during working hours.  

There is however a balance that needs to be found as it may be detrimental to be too prescriptive with any new rules aimed to support the ‘right to disconnect’ (such as a ban on working outside of working hours) as this runs the risk of removing the positive aspect of remote working which allows for more flexibility.  

Employers may consider the following potential action in the meantime: 

  • Communicate clearly with employees on what is required from them during this ‘new normal’; 
  • Offer mental health awareness training in the workplace which may need to be adapted for varying levels of seniority; 
  • Encourage employees to use their annual leave. Employers should also ensure that there is a system in place for adequate handover and cover when employees are on annual leave to reduce the need to contact them or for them to feel as though they need to work when they are on leave; 
  • Highlight and promote the importance of taking breaks and not working outside of working hours including checking emails to help employees find a clear divide between their work and their personal lives. This could also include encouraging employees to communicate whether urgent responses are needed to assist with prioritising workloads; 
  • Arrange for managers to check in with employees regularly to establish work capacity and investigate if they find that an employee has an excessive workload; 
  • Monitor out of hours communications and if there are any concerns, employers should raise this sensitively and have an open conversation to check in with the employee on whether there are any pressures with which they can be supported. 

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 12 February 2020
  • Employment

The Equal Pay Bill: is the current equal pay law fit for purpose?

We all followed the recent equal pay claim which was brought by the TV presenter Samira Ahmed against her employer, the BBC.

art
  • 12 February 2020
  • Employment

“Long-term effect” must be satisfied at time of discriminatory acts

The EAT has clarified when the “long-term effect” aspect of the definition of disability will be satisfied.

art
  • 12 February 2020
  • Immigration

Are we punishing the academics?

With the introduction of the Global Talent Visa, there comes the new rule that any absences from the UK for the purposes of research will not be taken into account when considering settlement under this visa route.

art
  • 12 February 2020
  • Employment

Not all one-off acts will be a ‘provision, criterion or practice’

The Court of Appeal (“CA”) in Ishola v Transport for London (“TFL”) has given guidance on the meaning of ‘provision, criterion or practice’ (PCP), an essential element for claims of indirect discrimination and failure to make reasonable adjustments.

art
  • 07 February 2020
  • Commercial Real Estate

The Registration Gap – a warning

The transfer of ownership in registered freehold or leasehold land or the grant of a registerable lease does not take effect until registered at the Land Registry. This means that from the date of the transfer/lease until the date of registration such rights are said to exist in ‘equity’ only and the legal estate does not vest in the new owner/tenant until registration is complete. The gap between the date of the transfer/lease and the date the legal estate vests in the new owner/tenant is often referred to as the ‘registration gap’

art
  • 07 February 2020
  • Corporate and M&A

Investor Relief

The Finance Act 2016 introduced investor relief which is essentially a tax relief for Capital Gains in a similar way to the operation of Entrepreneurs Relief. On qualification any capital gain is reduced from the usual capital gains rate – currently 20% to 10%.