Search

How can we help?

Icon

The pitfalls of a sole director company

Many small companies will have a sole director and shareholder, with no company secretary.  If the director shareholder were to unexpectedly die the company may be in a vacuum.  This was what the Court had to consider in the recent case of Kings Court Trust Limited v Lancashire Cleaning Services Limited.

The sole director and shareholder, Mr Pilling, died leaving his company with no director, shareholder or secretary.  The company continued to trade and a buyer for it had been found.  However, without any directors its bank had frozen its account, leaving the company unable to pay staff wages or its VAT bill.  Mr Pilling’s personal representatives (PRs) had applied for probate but this had not yet been granted.  The PRs were unable to take any steps on behalf of the company, such as appointing new directors, unless they were entered onto the company’s Register of Members.  They made an urgent application to Court for this to happen under section 125 Companies Act 2006.

The Court made the order sought, although stressed the wholly exceptional nature of the case.  It seems very likely that had there not been the extreme urgency caused by the frozen bank account the PRs would at least have been told to wait until probate was granted.

Although disaster was averted on this occasion, it still required an urgent application to Court.  Companies with a sole director and shareholder that are governed by ‘Table A’ Articles of Association should consider avoiding this risk by either (a) appointing a second director or (b) updating its constitution to allow the PRs of the sole director shareholder to appoint a new director.

The PRs were unable to take any steps on behalf of the company, such as appointing new directors, unless they were entered onto the company’s Register of Members.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 03 February 2025
  • Employment

Indirect discrimination: How mandated office returns could discriminate against working mothers

In this article though, we will focus on one of the biggest potential hurdles, and the one that is garnering the most media attention and the most criticism. Is a return to work policy discriminatory on grounds of sex?

art
  • 20 January 2025
  • Employment

AI Opportunities Action Plan – The impact of AI on employment

The Government has announced its ‘AI Opportunities Action Plan’ in which it plans to increase the use of AI across the UK to ensure the UK is a world leader in the field. 

art
  • 14 January 2025
  • Employment

Is this the end of working from home?

In this article, we explore what legal rights employees and businesses have in this context as well as considering more commercial factors.

art
  • 08 January 2025
  • Employment

Round-up of employment law changes in 2024 and what to look out for in 2025

In this article, we will take a whistlestop tour of the various key employment law and case law changes that have taken place this year and then we will highlight what to expect in 2025.

Pub
  • 06 January 2025
  • Employment

TUPE Podcast Series: Unfair Dismissal and TUPE

In this eighth episode of our TUPE Podcast Series, Katie Glendinning, a Partner in the employment team, focuses on dismissals in a TUPE context and, in particular, the additional protection afforded by TUPE.

art
  • 03 January 2025
  • Employment

Fire and Rehire – Change to compensation rules from 20 January 2025

This article considers the Regulatory Policy Committee’s recently published opinion on the impact assessments for the Employment Rights Bill. The Committee assessed the quality of evidence and analysis used to inform the government proposals and came to the overall opinion that the impact assessments are currently “not fit for purpose”.