Search

How can we help?

Icon

The introduction of the new ‘fire and rehire’ code of practice

The practice of fire and rehire, which involves dismissing and re-engaging employees (often as a means of changing their terms and conditions of employment), has received a lot of negative press in recent years. During the coronavirus pandemic for example, British Airways warned unions that if it could not reach an agreement over new terms and conditions, it would push through the issue by giving staff notice and offering them new contracts. Dismissal and re-engagement is a well-established and permissible legal mechanism, but some claim it has been abused by employers, as the threat of fire and rehire is often enough to ensure employees are ‘voluntarily’ agreeing to lower pay and reduced terms and conditions.

The public and many politicians were appalled by the British Airways saga and many other highly-publicised fire and re-hire scenarios. As a result, plans were made by the Conservatives to introduce a statutory code of practice on ‘fire and rehire’. This code – The Code of Practice on Dismissal and Re-engagement – has now come into force, as of the 18th July 2024.

What will the code mean for you?

The code, which can be read in full here, shall be taken into account by employment tribunals in certain types of cases, such as unfair dismissal. Where an employer unreasonably fails to follow the code, the tribunals will now be able to uplift any compensation awarded by up to 25%.

The code demands that employers only use the mechanism of fire and rehire as a last resort, requiring them first to consult for as long as reasonably possible. However, the code does not set out defined parameters as to what might be long enough, nor does it set out a minimum consultation period.

 

The Code of Practice on Dismissal and Re-engagement – has now come into force, as of the 18th July 2024.

The code also urges employers to explore alternative options to re-engaging on lesser terms and conditions, and suggests that employees should involve Acas at a formative stage.

Where an employer’s proposals are not agreed, the code tells employers to re-assess the proposals and contemplate any employee feedback. Employers are advised not to use threats of dismissal to force employees into agreeing to new terms and conditions

When agreement has been reached on the terms, the code encourages employers to implement them in phases.

The future of the code

The code is unlikely to have a substantial impact on the practice of fire and rehire, and it has been accused by unions of lacking teeth. Having said this, there is uncertainty around how long the code will apply for, given that the Labour government that is now in charge has made promises to scrap ‘fire and rehire’ practices entirely.

The current Labour Government has said it will “reform the law to provide effective remedies against abuse and replace the inadequate statutory code brought in by the Government, with a strengthened code of practice.” We will need to wait to see if Labour’s new code of practice will have teeth where the current code is said not to.

Please do reach out to our employment lawyers if you want more information and we would be happy to help.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 09 December 2024
  • Employment

Mistletoe and Missteps: Preventing Harassment at Christmas Parties

As the festive season approaches, offices are coming together for their annual Christmas parties, offering a chance to unwind and celebrate the year’s achievements. However, whilst these events provide a necessary release and recognition of employee’s contributions, they also present a heightened risk of inappropriate behaviour, particularly sexual harassment.

art
  • 28 November 2024
  • Employment

Employment Rights Bill: The Regulatory Policy Committee opinion

This article considers the Regulatory Policy Committee’s recently published opinion on the impact assessments for the Employment Rights Bill. The Committee assessed the quality of evidence and analysis used to inform the government proposals and came to the overall opinion that the impact assessments are currently “not fit for purpose”.

art
  • 19 November 2024
  • Employment

Booting out discrimination: Referee David Coote suspended over alleged derogatory comments

It has recently been reported that referee David Coote has been suspended with immediate effect, pending a full investigation, after making derogatory comments. In this article, we will focus on the alleged discriminatory comments made and learnings from this. Given that the matter is currently being investigated, it will be a big case to watch, as if the allegations are proven, what action could be taken against Mr Coote?

art
  • 13 November 2024
  • Employment

Modern Slavery Act 2015: Select Committee calls on the Government for change

The article will cover the House of Lords Modern Slavery Act 2015 Committee’s recent report and key recommendations following its inquiry into the impact and effectiveness of the Modern Slavery Act.

art
  • 12 November 2024
  • Employment

Redundancies on the Rise: What alternatives are available?

As we move into the second half of the year, and with the cost-of-living crisis not yet showing signs of easing, many businesses are feeling the pinch and are exploring their options in a bid to save costs.

art
  • 11 November 2024
  • Employment

Clarkslegal welcomes a new employment partner

Clarkslegal is delighted to announce the appointment of Katie Glendinning as a partner within our highly-ranked employment team.