Search

How can we help?

Icon

Tenant wins challenge against Landlord’s ‘conclusive’ service charge statement

In the recent case of  Sara & Hossein Asset Holdings Ltd v Blacks Outdoor Retail Ltd [2020] EWHC 1263 (Ch), the High Court held that a tenant could challenge the service charge sums due under their lease, despite a clause in their lease stating that the landlord’s service charge certificate was ‘conclusive’ save for absent manifest or mathematical error or fraud.

Blacks Outdoor Retail Ltd (Blacks) was the tenant of commercial premises at Chicago Buildings, Whitechapel and Stanley Street.  Their landlord – Sara & Hossein Asset Holdings Ltd (S&HAH Ltd) instigated proceedings against them for non-payment of service charge over the previous two years.  The service charge amounted to £55,000 in the first year and £400,000 in the second year.  S&HAH Ltd asserted that they had produced a certificate in respect of such sums and that in accordance with the terms of the lease, such certificate was ‘conclusive’.  However, Blacks argued that the costs S&HAH Ltd were seeking to recover were in respect of modernisation and improvement works and as such were not recoverable as service charge, as they did not fall within the landlord’s repairing obligations under the lease.

The High Court found in favour of Blacks and held that, the service charge certificate was conclusive as to the amount of the service charge, but was not conclusive as to whether those costs actually fell within the scope of the service charge payable by the tenant under the lease.  Accordingly the tenant was entitled to challenge the service charge costs.

Landlords should carefully consider whether the sums they are seeking to recover actually fall within the service charge provisions of their lease

While this case turned on the specific wording of Black’s lease, it nonetheless provides a useful reminder that a clause purporting that a service charge certificate is ‘conclusive’ will not be conclusive where those sums were never properly due.  Landlords should carefully consider whether the sums they are seeking to recover actually fall within the service charge provisions of their lease, particularly in respect of improvement and modernisation works.  Similarly, tenants should scrutinise any certificates/demands for payment so that they only pay what is due under their lease.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 15 October 2026

Chambers and Partners 2026: Clarkslegal’s continued commitment to excellence

Clarkslegal is delighted to announce that we have once again been recognised by Chambers and Partners as a leading firm in their 2026 guide.

Pub
  • 15 October 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Data breaches and ICO investigations: Responding with confidence

In this podcast Harry Berryman and Zahra Navarro discuss recent ICO enforcement action, common causes of data breaches, and the practical steps organisations should take to respond effectively when incidents occur.

art
  • 14 October 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

London Court of International Arbitration v International Chamber of Commerce: Key differences

Compare LCIA and ICC arbitration rules, costs, confidentiality provisions and expedited procedures. Learn the key differences between these leading international arbitration institutions and how to choose the right option for your commercial dispute.

art
  • 09 October 2026
  • Employment

Neurodiversity, probation and unfair dismissal: What employers need to know

The next few years are introducing landmark changes to employment law in the UK, under the Employment Rights Act 2025. Part of these changes include the amendments to rights to unfair dismissal, reducing the qualifying period for this right to six months.

art
  • 08 October 2026
  • Commercial Real Estate

Packing up rate mitigation – The end of ‘box shifting’?

What is box shifting and how does it affect property owners and tenants? We examine the Court of Appeal’s decision in City of London v 48th Street Holdings and its implications for intermittent occupation, business rates and lease arrangements.

art
  • 30 September 2026

Clarkslegal celebrates strong results in the Legal 500 UK 2027

Clarkslegal would like to thank its clients for the outstanding feedback that contributed to the firm’s recognition in the Legal 500 UK Solicitors 2027 Guide. We are proud to be recognised across five key practice areas: Litigation, Property, Corporate & Commercial, Employment, and Immigration.