Search

How can we help?

Icon
  • 09 January 2020

Should employers really be held to account in cases of vicarious liability?

Employment lawyers and business alike are awaiting a Supreme Court ruling, which is expected in February, regarding whether or not one of the largest UK banks should be liable for the acts of a doctor hired to carry out pre-employment medical checks. 126 individuals claimed that the doctor had sexually assaulted them and that the bank should be held vicariously liable for his actions. To date, the courts have held the bank liable for the doctor’s actions and the final decision now rests with the Supreme Court.

In the employment context, vicarious liability refers to a situation in which an employer is held responsible for the acts (or omissions) of its workers. If the Supreme Court agrees with previous rulings in the above case, it will be more important than ever before for employers to take positive steps to reduce the risk of being liable for the actions of its workers.

Employer is held responsible for the acts (or omissions) of its workers.

Employers could seek to avoid liability if they can establish that all reasonable steps to prevent the alleged act or omission have been taken – but what does this mean in practical terms? Avoiding liability is not a straightforward exercise, however, at the very least employers should ensure they implement robust policies governing the conduct of their workers, enforce clear workplace standards and provide regular training to ensure that workers are aware of what is, and is not, acceptable conduct.

If you have any concerns or would like a review of your current policies or training programmes, please do not hesitate to contact us.

subscribe to our mailing list

About this article

  • Subject
    Should employers really be held to account in cases of vicarious liability?
  • Author
  • Expertise
  • Published
    09 January 2020

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

  • Subject
    Should employers really be held to account in cases of vicarious liability?
  • Author
  • Expertise
  • Published
    09 January 2020

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 29 November 2023
  • Employment

How will the Autumn Statement 2023 affect the Construction Industry?

On 22 November 2023 Parliament was presented with the Chancellor’s Autumn Statement.

Pub
  • 29 November 2023
  • Public Procurement

Public Procurement Annual Update 2023

Watch Clarkslegal’s Public Procurement team as they provide you with the essential information businesses involved in public tenders need to know.
art
  • 28 November 2023
  • Employment

The risk of insolvency with equal pay claims: how can you avoid them?

Even though the law states that everyone should be paid equally for work of comparable value, this does not always happen in practice.

Pub
  • 21 November 2023
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Privacy matters: How the 8 data subject rights protect personal data

In this guide we explore the 8 data subject rights under the UK GDPR and discover how they play a vital role in preserving your organisation’s privacy standards in an increasingly interconnected world.
Pub
  • 21 November 2023
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Overview of Data Subject Access Requests

In recent months, we have witnessed a series of high-profile data breaches that have brought data protection issues to the forefront of the public’s mind and with this comes an increase in Data Subject Access Requests (DSARs).
art
  • 17 November 2023
  • Corporate and M&A

Should AI delete humans out of the legal sphere?

AI could potentially streamline routine legal tasks. However, there are consequences to consider when it comes to AI in the legal sphere.

See More