Search

How can we help?

Icon

Public procurement – what is coming up in 2023?

Next year will see the biggest changes to public procurement law in more than a decade when the Procurement Bill 2022 passes into law (this is currently expected to be sometime around mid-2023). 

The Bill has already been subject to numerous amendments, and more are likely before the Bill receives Royal Assent. However, we do now have from the Bill a good idea as to how and which of the ideas and reforms contained in Procurement Green Paper, published by the Government in December 2020, will be implemented.  

So, what’s changing and what’s not changing? 

  • The concept of the ‘most economically advantageous tender’(MEAT) is being replaced with simply the ‘most advantageous tender’ (MAT). This is intended to give contracting authorities more scope to consider factors other than price in their assessment of tenders, for example social value. 
  • There will be a new central debarment register which enables bidders to be excluded from participating in public tenders for prior poor performance. 
  • The principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination will be retained. Contracting authorities must take reasonable steps to ensure they do not put a supplier at an unfair advantage or disadvantage and must not discriminate against suppliers from a ‘Treaty state’ – this will mean a country which has an international procurement agreement with the UK. 
  • However, the principles of transparency and proportionality do not appear in the Bill. Instead, the Bill introduces a number of key procurement ‘Objectives’, which require all contracting authorities to have regard to: 
  1. Delivering value for money; 
  2. Maximising public benefit; 
  3. Sharing information; and 
  4. Acting with integrity. 

 

While bringing some welcome simplification of the public procurement regime, the Bill does not make as many sweeping changes as the Green Paper may have envisaged.  

  • Contracting authorities will still have an obligation to publish a contract award notice informing bidders of the outcome of a tender. However, this will also now be accompanied by an ‘Assessment Summary’ for each bidder, which provides details on the contracting authority’s assessment of that bidder’s bid, and the ‘most advantageous tender’ submitted. 
  • Contracting authorities will still be obliged to hold standstill periods – although the duration of the standstill period is changing from ten (calendar) days to eight working days beginning on the day on which a contract award notice is published. 
  • The automatic suspension, and the power of the courts to lift it, is staying. However, the American Cyanamid test will no longer apply to applications to lift the automatic suspension. Instead, a new test will require the court to have regard to the public interest in public contracts being awarded lawfully, avoiding delay in the supply of public goods and services, the interests of suppliers (including whether damages are an adequate remedy), and any other matter the court considers appropriate. Whether this test will produce results any different to the current American Cyanamid test remains to be seen.  
  • Damages will remain available as a remedy. The Bill does not implement the proposal contained in the Green Paper to cap damages awards. 

Overall, while bringing some welcome simplification of the public procurement regime, the Bill does not make as many sweeping changes as the Green Paper may have envisaged.  

We will continue to monitor the Bill as it passes through Parliament and will publish a further update in due course. In the meantime, the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 continue to apply. 

Check out our other Public Procurement resources here. 

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 06 December 2018
  • Construction

2018/2019 – 5 key themes in Construction Law

2018 has been a rollercoaster year for construction.  The collapse of Carillion casting light on unfair payment practices, abuse of retentions and the woeful profit margins.

art
  • 05 October 2018
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Assessing Costs – What does proportionality really mean?

In civil litigation the presumption is that the losing party pays the winner’s costs. However, unless agreed, such costs must be assessed by the Court. This process is of crucial importance because the winning party must pick up the shortfall itself, eating into the proceeds of claim.

art
  • 14 November 2017
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

When Can I Refuse To Mediate?

Anyone who has been involved in a legal dispute will have been told to consider engaging in some form of alternative dispute resolution, most often mediation, before the issue of proceedings.

Pub
  • 11 October 2017
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Hot topics in Directors’ Liabilities

This webinar gives some practical examples how those liabilities play out in practice and cases the Courts have had to consider and the lessons from these, and implications for Directors. 

art
  • 08 September 2017
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Victim of fraud? How to identify the perpetrator

Every day companies and individuals lose money to fraudsters, who hack into email accounts and alter emails sent from companies to their customers, or send sophisticated phishing emails from fake domain names designed to dupe customers into believing they are from a trusted supplier.

art
  • 05 September 2017
  • Construction

How to avoid construction payment disputes

Payment disputes continue to be one of the most common problems in the construction industry, and we have published numerous articles on the key court decisions that affect the interpretation of payment provisions