Search

How can we help?

Icon

Oxford Professor wins age discrimination claim

A former physics professor at Oxford University has won his claims of age discrimination and unfair dismissal after he was forced to retire following his 68th birthday.

The University’s employer-justified retirement age (EJRA), in place since 2011, requires academics to retire before they turn 69, with the justification that it allows for younger and more diverse academics to progress.

Despite his position as Head of Department and his involvement in several large-scale projects, the professor’s application to renew his contract for three years was rejected in 2017.

He presented evidence to the Tribunal that as a result of the EJRA, only 2-4% more vacancies had been created.

A former physics professor at Oxford University has won his claims of age discrimination and unfair dismissal.

The Tribunal found that the professor had been unfairly discriminated against on the grounds of age and that his dismissal was unfair. They held the measure was disproportionate given both the “trivial” number of vacancies created and the measure’s discriminatory impact, and accordingly it had not been justified. The University is considering an appeal.

This is the second case against Oxford University’s compulsory retirement age, following on from the unsuccessful claim by an English professor in May 2019. This latest ruling by the Tribunal on Oxford’s EJRA is likely to impact on his appeal later this year.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 23 October 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Section 172 Companies Act 2006: Key lessons from Saxon Woods v Costa

The Supreme Court’s decision in Saxon Woods v Costa UKSC 21 clarifies directors’ duties under Section 172 Companies Act 2006, confirming that good faith requires both honest belief and appropriate conduct.

art
  • 22 October 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Shareholders’ Agreements for Founders and Investors – SHA Series Part 3 of 5

A shareholders’ agreement is arguably one of the most valuable corporate governance agreements (along with articles of association) in any private UK company with more than one shareholder.

art
  • 19 October 2026
  • Immigration

Right to Work Checks: Are UK businesses becoming immigration enforcement officers?

The UK’s Right to Work regime has undergone a significant expansion, with changes taking effect from 1 October 2026.

art
  • 15 October 2026

Clarkslegal celebrates continued success in Chambers and Partners UK 2027

Clarkslegal is delighted to announce that we have once again been recognised by Chambers and Partners UK 2027, celebrating continued success across the firm and a number of enhanced individual rankings.

Pub
  • 15 October 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Data breaches and ICO investigations: Responding with confidence

In this podcast Harry Berryman and Zahra Navarro discuss recent ICO enforcement action, common causes of data breaches, and the practical steps organisations should take to respond effectively when incidents occur.

art
  • 14 October 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

London Court of International Arbitration v International Chamber of Commerce: Key differences

Compare LCIA and ICC arbitration rules, costs, confidentiality provisions and expedited procedures. Learn the key differences between these leading international arbitration institutions and how to choose the right option for your commercial dispute.