Search

How can we help?

Icon

Oxford Professor wins age discrimination claim

A former physics professor at Oxford University has won his claims of age discrimination and unfair dismissal after he was forced to retire following his 68th birthday.

The University’s employer-justified retirement age (EJRA), in place since 2011, requires academics to retire before they turn 69, with the justification that it allows for younger and more diverse academics to progress.

Despite his position as Head of Department and his involvement in several large-scale projects, the professor’s application to renew his contract for three years was rejected in 2017.

He presented evidence to the Tribunal that as a result of the EJRA, only 2-4% more vacancies had been created.

A former physics professor at Oxford University has won his claims of age discrimination and unfair dismissal.

The Tribunal found that the professor had been unfairly discriminated against on the grounds of age and that his dismissal was unfair. They held the measure was disproportionate given both the “trivial” number of vacancies created and the measure’s discriminatory impact, and accordingly it had not been justified. The University is considering an appeal.

This is the second case against Oxford University’s compulsory retirement age, following on from the unsuccessful claim by an English professor in May 2019. This latest ruling by the Tribunal on Oxford’s EJRA is likely to impact on his appeal later this year.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 27 April 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Quarterly Insights: Key Corporate & Commercial Topics – Q2 2026

Join Stuart Mullins and Emma Docking as they explore key corporate and commercial topics, including SME growth and exit strategies for 2026, EMI schemes for employee incentives, and the importance of drag along and tag along rights.

art
  • 22 April 2026
  • Commercial Real Estate

Historic rent reviews: A warning for tenants

We have been asked whether a landlord is able to operate historic rent reviews. 

art
  • 14 April 2026
  • Employment

Updates to Vento Bands 2026: Injury to feelings awards

For discrimination and detriment cases, compensation can also cover non-financial losses, which, in most cases, will include an injury to feelings award.

art
  • 13 April 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Renters’ Rights Act coming into force on 1 May 2026

The long-awaited Renters’ Rights Act 2025 (RRA) comes into force on 1 May 2026, bringing the biggest changes to the private rental sector since the 1980s. So what do landlords need to know about what is changing?

art
  • 13 April 2026
  • Immigration

Sponsor Licence Compliance in 2026: Increased Scrutiny, Increased Risk – Time to Audit

The Home Office’s latest updates to sponsor guidance in March 2026, alongside broader immigration rule changes introduced this year, signal a decisive shift in the UK’s sponsorship regime.

art
  • 10 April 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Is your tech discriminatory?

Employers are increasingly reliant on technology to assist with all kinds of functions – from strengthening security to streamlining recruitment processes.