Search

How can we help?

Icon

Short-term letting? Check your Tenant Lease before you Breach

As the pandemic continues, those who own residential property may be looking to the future and considering whether there is money to be made by short-term lets (e.g. Airbnb) or by permanently relocating their business and operating from home.  However, the recent upper tribunal case of Triplerose Ltd v Beattie and another [2020] UKUT 180 (LC) serves as a timely reminder to those who own leasehold property that their lease is likely to contain restrictions around how they use and occupy their property.

In the case of Triplerose Ltd v Beattie the tenant (Mr Beattie) was the owner of a long leasehold flat.  He relocated due to his work and while he still used his flat between 1-3 nights a week, he decided to advertise his flat on Airbnb and Booking.com to let for short-term occupation.  The flat was used to provide serviced accommodation with the check-ins, check-outs and laundry services provided by the booking company.

The Landlord (Tripelrose) objected to this on the basis that Mr Beattie’s lease contained covenants:

  1. Not to carry on or permit to be carried on upon the property any trade or business whatsoever; and
  2. Not to use the property for any purpose other than as a private dwelling house for occupation by one family at any one time.

The First-Tier Tribunal found in favour of the tenant and did not find that the covenants had been breached.

The Landlord however, appealed to the Upper Tribunal where they held that when looking at whether or not the property was being used as a ‘private dwelling house’ it was important to ask whether the use of the flat by the occupier for the time being was “as a private dwelling house” i.e. being in occupation was not enough.  The Upper Tribunal found in favour of the Landlord and held that case law demonstrated that the use of residential property for short-term occupation by a succession of paying guests was a breach of a covenant requiring use only as a private residence or dwelling house.

However, the Upper Tribunal did not think that there had been a breach of the covenant in respect of operating a trade or business at the flat.  They held that no activity was carried on at the property which amounted to a business, since the lettings and laundry services were not actually carried out at the flat.

 

A timely reminder to those who own leasehold property that their lease is likely to contain restrictions around how they use and occupy their property.

The Upper Tribunal upheld the Landlord’s appeal and this decision reflects emerging case law in this area that a succession of short term lets to paying guests (like the Airbnb model) is likely to be in breach of covenants in respect of use as a private dwelling house.

While landlords will no doubt welcome this decision, it is important to remember that decisions will be made on a case-by-case basis and it is important to consider the specific wording of the relevant lease clause to check that this type of letting is prohibited.  Tenants also need to be aware that they run the risk of legal action if they let their property on a number of short term lets in breach of similarly worded residential use covenants.

In addition, this case also provides some useful commentary on what constitutes the carrying on of a business.  Landlords may need to consider careful drafting if there are certain ‘trade or business’ activities they want to prohibit.  This may be even more important in the current climate where tenants may wish to operate their business from home.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 01 June 2023
  • Employment

Facts employees should know about their personal data

We previously published an article on facts an employer should know about holding personal data, so it is only fair that we also write about the other side of the coin – facts employees should know as individuals whose personal data is held by their employer.

art
  • 01 June 2023
  • Immigration

What is the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) and how much do you have to pay?

The Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) is a levy on companies who sponsor migrant workers. This levy was imposed on 6 April 2017. The Government states that the charge has been levied to contribute towards addressing the skills gap in the local economy.

art
  • 26 May 2023
  • Employment

Avoiding discrimination in flexible working requests

The right to request flexible working is currently available to employees with at least 26 weeks’ service and is set to be extended further under new Government reforms.

art
  • 25 May 2023
  • Corporate and M&A

Management Buyout – Top 5 things to consider

A management buyout is a financial transaction in which a member of the management team purchases the company from its registered owner. MBO’s usually occur in private companies in an effort to enhance profitability and simplify strategies.

art
  • 25 May 2023
  • Employment

Carer’s Leave Bill set to become law

On 19 May 2023, the Carer’s Leave Bill had its third reading in the House of Lords, and upon receiving Royal Assent, will become law. There is not yet a date for the implementation of this bill, however it is likely that this will happen relatively quickly upon receiving Royal Assent, so is definitely one to keep an eye on.

art
  • 18 May 2023
  • Immigration

Navigating SOC Codes

When it comes to UK immigration, understanding the intricacies of the system is vital. One significant aspect of the process revolves around Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) codes. SOC codes play a crucial role in determining the eligibility for an individual to apply for a work visa, assessing skill levels, and matching individuals to appropriate job roles.