Search

How can we help?

Icon

Employer’s reasonable and genuine belief can be sufficient for SOSR dismissal

In Nayak v Royal Mail Group, the EAT upheld the tribunal’s decision that an employer’s genuine and reasonable belief that an employee was no longer permitted to work in the UK was sufficient to show that he had been dismissed for some other substantial reason (SOSR).

It is Royal Mail’s policy to conduct employee immigration checks every six months where visa outcomes are pending.  Mr Nayak worked under a number of visas throughout his employment at Royal Mail (RM) and, upon expiry of his visa in 2010, applied for a Tier 4 (General) student migrant visa.  Whilst this was originally refused, he successfully appealed and his application was passed to the Home Office for consideration and processing.

Mr Nayak’s situation meant that he was subject to RM’s immigration check policy.  However, when asked to provide proof of his right to work in the UK on three occasions between August 2012 and February 2013, he failed to cooperate with RM’s requests.  Further enquiries were made of him between December 2013 and May 2014 and he was told that the right to work could only last whilst his visa application remained pending.  Given that his application had been made more than four years previously, and in the absence of any evidence of his immigration status, RM could not simply assume that it remained pending.  Mr Nayak was advised that his failure to provide the requisite evidence may result in his dismissal and, when he did not do so, was dismissed.  His appeal was unsuccessful and he brought a claim for unfair dismissal.

 

Caroline Lendrum

Associate

View profile

+44 118 960 4669

The EAT upheld the tribunal’s decision that an employer’s genuine and reasonable belief that an employee was no longer permitted to work in the UK was sufficient to show that he had been dismissed for SOSR.

The claim was dismissed both at first instance (by the tribunal) and on appeal.  The EAT upheld the tribunal’s decision that an employer’s genuine and reasonable belief that an employee was no longer permitted to work in the UK was sufficient to show that he had been dismissed for SOSR.  There was adequate evidence that RM had attempted to establish Mr Nayak’s immigration status over a number of years and he had continually failed to cooperate in the process.

The case demonstrates that a dismissal for SOSR can be justified by the employer’s genuine and reasonable belief.  This is in contrast to a statutory restriction dismissal (which is another potentially fair ground for dismissal) where an employer’s actual knowledge is required.

About this article

Disclaimer

This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Caroline Lendrum

Associate

View profile

+44 118 960 4669

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 06 August 2025
  • Employment

Enhanced redundancy packages explained

It is difficult for employees and employers alike when the time comes to make redundancies across a business. For those impacted, it can be particularly difficult to understand the terms used, and what your entitlements are as an employee.

art
  • 06 August 2025
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Product liability reform: New Product Regulation and Metrology Act 2025

The law on product safety is set to undergo reform as the new Product Regulation and Metrology Act 2025 was passed in July.

art
  • 04 August 2025
  • Immigration

The UK Global Talent Visa: Unlocking Opportunities for the World’s Brightest Minds

The Global Talent visa is a prestigious UK immigration route designed to attract exceptional individuals who have demonstrated – or have the potential to demonstrate – significant achievements in science, research, engineering, arts and culture, or digital technology.

art
  • 29 July 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

Right to Renew: The Law Commission’s Statement

Many commercial tenants occupy their premises under tenancies. Part 2 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (the “Act”) gives these business tenants the right to remain in their premises when their tenancies would have otherwise come to an end, this is known as a “right to renew” or “security of tenure”.

art
  • 29 July 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

Articles of Association v. Shareholders Agreement in England and Wales: Which one works best for you and your company?

The decision of whether to solely rely on a company’s Articles of Association or implement a bespoke Shareholders’ Agreement depends on the specific needs and priorities of the individual shareholders and the company alike.

Pub
  • 28 July 2025
  • Employment

Talking Employment Law: The Employment Rights Bill – Part 3

In part three of the Employment Rights Bill podcast series, Louise Keenan and Lucy White, members of the employment team, will discuss changes to fire and re-hire practices, harassment, zero-hour contracts and tribunal limitation periods.