Search

How can we help?

Icon

Directors: When should you consider creditors’ interests?

Amidst the current economic uncertainty, directors of distressed businesses may find themselves having to balance conflicting interests. When acting in good faith and in the best interests of the company facing increasing financial difficulty, at what point do directors have to consider the creditors’ interests against shareholders’ interests? It is a vital point for directors to consider given their personal liability for any breach of their duties.

It had long been established that directors had a duty to consider creditors’ interests prior to a company becoming insolvent, by which point any equity held in the company is nominal in any event. However, caselaw had not provided specific guidance as to when exactly directors had to give due consideration to the interests of creditors of the company.

A recent case decided in late 2022 in the Supreme Court, BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA, has helped to provide some guidance to directors facing this issue. In this case, directors had caused a sizeable dividend to be paid to the company’s sole shareholder. The company was solvent at the time and the dividend was paid lawfully given the company had sufficient distributable reserves, although the company had liabilities that gave rise to the potential that it would become insolvent at a later date.

In this instance, the directors had accounted for the liabilities – relating to historic river pollution – but had underestimated their full extent. The company became insolvent nearly 10 years later, and the appellant sought to recover an amount equal to the dividend payment from the directors, alleging that they had breached their duties to the company’s creditors. Whilst the appeal was dismissed, the case provided useful guidance to directors going forwards.

The Court deviated from previous guidance that creditors’ interests be considered when there is a ‘real’ possibility of insolvency, as it considered this too wide a definition. Instead, directors can consider the duties to trigger at two distinct points:

  1. Directors should begin to consider creditors’ interests when they know, or ought to know, that insolvency is probable. The greater the likelihood of insolvency, the greater weight should be attached to creditors’ interests. Inevitably, this creates some ambiguity as to when insolvency becomes ‘probable’.
  2. When insolvency or administration becomes inevitable, creditors’ interests become paramount against shareholders’ interests.

The company had liabilities that gave rise to the potential that it would become insolvent at a later date.

Practically, this means that directors should use a sliding scale, with the more weight attached to creditors interests as the risk of insolvency increases from the point it becomes probable. If you would like further guidance through this process or how to protect your business through uncertain times, contact our restructuring team for more information.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 28 July 2025
  • Employment

Talking Employment Law: The Employment Rights Bill – Part 3

In part three of the Employment Rights Bill podcast series, Louise Keenan and Lucy White, members of the employment team, will discuss changes to fire and re-hire practices, harassment, zero-hour contracts and tribunal limitation periods.

art
  • 21 July 2025
  • Employment

When the ‘Kiss Cam’ Captures More Than Just a Moment: Romantic Relationships in the Workplace and the Legal Risks

Imagine this: A packed Coldplay concert. Tens of thousands of fans. Suddenly, the “kiss cam” camera pans to the crowd and lands on a man and woman sharing an affectionate embrace.

art
  • 15 July 2025
  • Employment

Employment law reform: UK Government launches review of parental leave and pay

On 1 July 2025, the Government announced that it would be conducting a full review of parental leave and pay, which includes maternity and paternity leave; parental leave; shared parental leave; adoption leave and others.

art
  • 11 July 2025
  • Employment

Silenced No More: The Future of NDAs in UK Employment Law

On 8 July 2025, the government announced plans to put forward measures to ban the use of Non-Disclosure Agreements (“NDAs”) to silence employees subjected to harassment or discrimination.

art
  • 04 July 2025
  • Employment

Update: The ‘Employment Rights Bill Implementation Roadmap’

The Employment Rights Bill is a draft law which is poised to expand the rights of employees, signifying a major overhaul in employment law. The ERB has already been passed by the House of Commons and is currently at the ‘Report Stage’ in the House of Lords.

art
  • 02 July 2025
  • Employment

Day One Rights: What the New UK Employment Bill Means for You and Your Workplace

Let’s unpack what’s changing in the UK Employments Rights Bill, and why it matters, and what both employees and employers should expect.