Search

How can we help?

Icon

Costs budgeting – welcome clarity from the Court of Appeal

Costs budgeting is now a central part of civil litigation.  The Court, lawyers and litigants are getting more comfortable with the process and it leads to much greater transparency and certainty.

Costs budgeting typically takes place at the costs and case management conference (CCMC), by which time the parties have already incurred pre-action costs, the costs of drafting the statements of case and of preparing for the CCMC itself.  The parties prepare budgets to cover their incurred and estimated future costs.  The Court fixes a budget for costs over the remainder of the litigation but not the costs incurred to date.

The final bill payable by the losing party at the end of litigation, unless agreement is reached, is decided by detailed assessment.  There had been some uncertainty over the interaction between costs budgeting and detailed assessment.

These issues were considered by the Court of Appeal in the case of Harrison -v- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust.  This was a clinical negligence case that settled shortly before trial for payment of £20,000 plus costs.  The Claimant’s approved costs budget was £197,000, including £108,000 incurred costs but excluding success fees and ATE insurance premium.  The Claimant’s total costs bill to the date of settlement was £467,000, including success fee, ATE premium and VAT.  As the parties could not agree the matter went to detailed assessment.  In particular, the parties could not agree on the extent to which the costs budgeting process was binding on detailed assessment.

 

Costs budgeting is now a central part of civil litigation.  The Court, lawyers and litigants are getting more comfortable with the process and it leads to much greater transparency and certainty.

The Court of Appeal ruled that:

  1. Budgeted estimated costs would only be departed from (upwards or downwards) during detailed assessment if there was good reason. The Court of Appeal made clear this was a high hurdle.
  1. Incurred costs at the date of the CCMC had not been ‘budgeted’ and would still be subject to detailed assessment in the usual way.
  1. The total of the assessed incurred costs and the budgeted costs will be liable to further reduction if disproportionate to value of the claim.

In addition to providing clarity to litigants, this case emphasises the importance of costs budgeting and ensuring that a realistic budget for litigation is set at an early stage in the proceedings.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 10 September 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

Trouble at the Table: The Challenges Facing the UK Hospitality Sector in the run up to Christmas 2025

The UK hospitality sector, long celebrated for its vibrancy and resilience, is facing a perfect storm of economic, operational, and structural challenges in 2025.

art
  • 09 September 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

Le bail commercial anglais: quelques points essentiels à considérer

Typiquement, les baux commerciaux en Angleterre sont de court terme, d’une durée de 5 ou 10 ans, avec un loyer de marché et des ajustements du loyer périodiques en fonction de l’inflation ou d’autres facteurs. 

art
  • 09 September 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

The Failure to Prevent Fraud Offence – be prepared to avoid criminal liability

The failure to prevent fraud offence is a new corporate offence which has come into force on 1 September 2025.

art
  • 08 September 2025
  • Employment

Can employers still make changes to contracts after the Employment Rights Bill?

The short answer is yes but it will be much more difficult for employers following the introduction of the Employment Rights Bill because their ability to fairly dismiss employees who do not agree contractual changes is being restricted. 

art
  • 05 September 2025
  • Privacy and Data Protection

When Ignoring a DSAR Becomes a Criminal Offence

On 3 September 2025, Mr Jason Blake appeared at Beverley Magistrates Court and was fined for failing to respond to a data subject access request (DSAR).

art
  • 04 September 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

Under the Hammer: essential tips for property auctions

This article explores the key considerations to keep in mind when selling or purchasing a property at auction.