Search

How can we help?

Icon

Blanket ban on facial hair deemed discriminatory

In Sethi v Elements Personnel Services, a Sikh man won his claim for religious discrimination against a recruitment agency who denied him work on account of his facial hair.

The Claimant adhered to Kesh, a practice which requires the person not to cut any body hair. He applied to an agency which specialised in providing workers for 5-star hotels, particularly in front-of-house food and beverage roles, and its dress code required male workers to be clean shaven.

The Claimant informed the agency he would not be able to shave his beard for religious reasons, and they responded that they could not offer him work as a result due to their client’s requirements for a clean-shaven appearance.

The tribunal found that the “no-beards” policy was a clear PCP that placed the Claimant at a significant disadvantage but accepted that the requirement for a smart appearance was a “legitimate aim”.

A Sikh man won his claim for religious discrimination against a recruitment agency who denied him work on account of his facial hair.

However, the tribunal was critical of the agency for not asking its clients whether they would make an exception for a Sikh worker unable to shave for religious reasons and held the blanket ban on facial hair was disproportionate.

The case is a reminder that whilst a dress code for client-facing roles is acceptable, employers must be careful that it does not disproportionately affect a particular group.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 31 October 2024
  • Employment

Potential impact of the Employment Rights Bill – Amanda Glover and Jesse Akiwumi write for Employee Benefits

Amanda Glover and Jesse Akiwumi write for Employee Benefits about the Employment Rights Bill, which addresses exploitative zero-hour contracts and allows workers to opt for guaranteed hours.

art
  • 29 October 2024
  • Privacy and Data Protection

The ICO’s 2024-2025 priorities for protecting children’s personal information online

The Information Commissioner Officer (the “ICO”) has set out its 2024-2025 priorities for protecting children’s personal information online.

Pub
  • 25 October 2024
  • Employment

TUPE Podcast Series: Changing Terms and Conditions

In this seventh episode of our TUPE Podcast Series, Louise Keenan will discuss the restrictions on changing terms and conditions for employees who are transferring. 

art
  • 25 October 2024
  • Employment

Changing Attitudes to Menopause

We have set out some answers to the frequently asked questions that employers ask when considering how to support a menopausal employee.

art
  • 25 October 2024
  • Employment

Court rules that ignoring employee’s greeting contributed to a breach of trust and confidence

In a recent ruling, an Employment Tribunal held that an employer had contributed to the breakdown of the trust and confidence with their employee by failing to respond to the employee’s greeting.

art
  • 21 October 2024
  • Commercial Real Estate

Commercial Property Standard Enquiries (CPSE): why is it important to get them right?

Commercial Property Standard Enquiries (CPSE) have been a part of a commercial property transaction for over two decades now. Nonetheless, it would be safe to say they can be tricky to deal with.