Search

How can we help?

Icon

Ex-employee ordered to delete confidential information stored on personal devices

In an age where employees are easily able to copy, store and upload confidential information, employers are having to become increasingly vigilant to prevent such information ending up in the wrong hands.  This was an issue for the claimants in Arthur J Gallagher Services (UK) Limited and others v Skriptchenko and others. The Claimants were a group of companies providing insurance brokerage services.  Upon leaving one of these companies, Mr Skriptchenko took the Claimants’ client list with him and used it to approach over 300 of the Claimants’ clients after joining a competitor firm.

The Claimants successfully applied for an order to inspect electronic devices and computers belonging to Mr Skriptchenko and his new employer. The Claimants were also granted an order that if any confidential  information relating to the Claimants was found, it was to be destroyed. In the absence of any previous authority on the destruction of confidential material, the High Court provided a detailed explanation as to why an order for destruction was appropriate in this case. The Court was particularly influenced by the “high degree of subterfuge” in this case and the fact that Mr Skriptchenko and his new employer knowingly breached confidentiality. The Court agreed with the Claimants that Mr Skriptchenko and his employer could not be trusted to delete any confidential information themselves and so a third party was appointed to inspect and destruct the material.

Monica Atwal

Managing Partner

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

In an age where employees are easily able to copy, store and upload confidential information, employers are having to become increasingly vigilant to prevent such information ending up in the wrong hands.

Although a small victory for employers, Mr Skriptchenko and his employer admitted that they had breached the Claimants’ confidentiality which played a key part in the Court’s willingness to grant an injunction. Employers who suspect but have little evidence to show that an ex-employee has taken confidential information are likely to face greater difficulties. To guard against this risk, employment contracts should clearly set out the employee’s obligations on termination  which employers may want to mirror in a Bring Your Own Device to Work policy.

Employmentbuddy.com 

About this article

Disclaimer

This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Monica Atwal

Managing Partner

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 20 June 2025
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Data Protection reform receives Royal Assent: What is the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 (DUAA) and what it means for your business

The UK’s data protection framework is about to undergo its most significant change since the UK GDPR came into force. After months of parliamentary debate, the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 (‘DUAA’) has successfully received Royal Assent.

art
  • 18 June 2025
  • Employment

Pride Month: How Can You Celebrate as an Employer

The UK held its first Pride Parade in 1972, inspired by events held in major American cities following the Stonewall rebellion in New York in June 1969.

Pub
  • 16 June 2025
  • Privacy and Data Protection

WhatsApp in the workplace: Is it legally safe?

In this podcast, Lucy White and Monica Mastropasqua, members of the Data Protection team at Clarkslegal, will address frequently asked questions from clients regarding the use of WhatsApp at work.

art
  • 13 June 2025
  • Employment

Human Resources – A Shift Towards artificial intelligence?

On 6 May 2025, the SRA authorised the first law firm providing legal services through artificial intelligence. Garfield.Law will provide an AI-powered tool which can assist businesses with the small claims court process, to aid in recovering unpaid debts.

art
  • 11 June 2025
  • Employment

Employment Contracts and Specific Performance

‘Specific performance’ is a type of equitable remedy available, in some circumstances, and at the court’s discretion, for breach of contract; it entails an order by the court which legally compels a party to a contract to fulfil its contractual obligations.

art
  • 10 June 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

Taking a commercial lease: The main points to negotiate when agreeing the Heads of Terms

What are the key areas tenants may want to pay particular attention to when agreeing to the Heads of Terms (HoTs).