- 08 April 2016
In the recent case of Ajaj v Metroline West Ltd UKEAT/018/15/RN an employee who disingenuously claimed to be unfit to attend work was held to be dishonest and had fundamentally breached the trust and confidence of the employee/employer relationship.
In Ajaj, the Claimant went off sick claiming to have suffered injury following a fall at work. He was referred to the company’s occupational health advisers, who concluded he was not fit to conduct his duties at work. Amid concerns over the genuine nature of Mr Ajaj’s injuries, covert video surveillance of the employee was arranged by Metroline. This video footage showed Mr Ajaj carrying out activities which he had claimed to Metroline he could not do. Mr Ajaj was summarily dismissed for gross misconduct based on his falsified claim of an injury at work, false claims for sick pay and misrepresentation of his ability to attend work.
The EAT (overturning the first instance decision) held that the dismissal for gross misconduct was within the band of reasonable responses.
The main issue for the EAT was whether there were grounds on which a reasonable employer could have held the belief that the Claimant had misrepresented his ability, and whether such grounds involved a serious breach of trust. Contrary to the Employment Tribunals findings; the Employment Appeal Tribunal concluded that Mr Ajaj misrepresenting his inability to attend work by reason of sickness amounted to dishonesty which was considered to be a fundamental breach of the trust and confidence. Summary dismissal was, therefore, within the band of reasonable responses.
The company’s occupational health advisers, who concluded he was not fit to conduct his duties at work.
The EAT reaffirmed the well-established test for misconduct dismissals, namely that an employer needs to show that:
- the employer believed that the employee was guilty of misconduct;
- there are reasonable grounds for this belief; and
- the employer has carried out as much investigation as was reasonable given the circumstances of the case.
Whilst this case focussed on covert video recording (which may not always be appropriate or reasonable), the increased use of social media by businesses has made it easier for employees to be caught out “pulling a sickie”. With the Rio Olympics and Euro 2016 coming this summer, employers should consider reviewing their policies on social media now to check if they are up to date and make clear that posts by employees could be reviewed and used as evidence in disciplinary proceedings.
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.
Read, listen and watch our latest insights
- 06 February 2023
Redundancy and settlement agreements – What you need to know
In this podcast Ciara Duggan and Sana Nahas members of the employment team at Clarkslegal will guide you through the tricky topic of redundancy and settlement agreements, covering what redundancy means for both employers and employees, as well as how settlement agreements work in practise.
- 01 February 2023
What to expect in construction in 2023
Recent years have brought a host of challenges for the construction industry but what we expect for 2023?
- 30 January 2023
Deborah Scales comments on ‘the proposed Mental Health First Aid Bill’
In People Management, Deborah Scales, Associate at Clarkslegal, discusses the reasons why people professionals would likely welcome a change in set law as a “relatively swift and cost-effective” way to help the workplace.
- 26 January 2023
- Privacy and Data Protection
UK Data Protection: Development round-up 2022 and 2023 trends
In this podcast Oscar Poku and Ciara Duggan members of the Data Protection team at Clarkslegal will be discussing the main developments in the UK Data Protection scene from 2022 and what trends to look out for in 2023.
- 25 January 2023
Government’s response to menopause recommendations in the workplace
The UK Government has recently rejected calls for the menopause to be made a ‘protected characteristic’ and for a large-scale pilot of menopause leave.
- 24 January 2023
Can I still apply to the EU Settlement Scheme after my divorce?
A family member of a ‘qualifying’ EEA national (including the EU, Switzerland, Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein) must apply for an EU Settlement Scheme (EUSS) Family Permit to join their EEA family member in the UK. The EUSS Family Permit is valid for 6 months, and once in the UK, the family member must apply for status under the EU Settlement Scheme.