Search

How can we help?

Icon

Failing to anonymise – the cost

A woman has received £75,000 in an out-of-court settlement after details of domestic abuse she had suffered were revealed by Greater Manchester Police (GMP) without her permission.

In 2014, the woman agreed with the GMP that it could use her experience in a training session for police officers and support agencies. She hoped this would help improve the support given to victims of domestic violence in the future but gave her consent on the understanding that the materials would be anonymised.

However, she later discovered that her identity and medical history had been disclosed in full and to a wider audience.  Also, those attending the session heard a recording of a 999 call she had made after she had been assaulted.

The woman alleged that she had suffered psychiatric harm and brought a claim for misuse of private information, breach of confidential information and non-compliance with the Data Protection Act 1998.

GMP admitted breaching her privacy but refused to admit that she was entitled to any damages (arguing that she had suffered no loss).  However, just days before the hearing, it settled out-of-court for £75,000.

GMP admitted breaching her privacy but refused to admit that she was entitled to any damages (arguing that she had suffered no loss).

This is believed to be one of the largest payments by a British force in a privacy case and serves as a reminder that employers should ensure that they have adequate training in place on data protection obligations .  Mistakes in this area can prove to be costly.  Earlier this year, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust was fined £180,000 after it revealed the email addresses of 781 users of an HIV service.

For useful data protection factsheets, checklists and templates, please visit employmentbuddy.com

For further advice on how to protect your business against data protection and privacy claims, please contact our employment lawyers on employment@clarkslegal.com

Disclaimer

This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 08 January 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Data Protection Audits: Launch Event

Join us for a breakfast networking session on Thursday 26th February 2026 as we officially launch our Data Protection Audit services.

art
  • 08 January 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Data Protection – what’s happened in 2025?

2025 has been a lively year for the data protection sphere, with the main talking point coming from the UK’s data reform Bill finally receiving Royal Assent on 19 June 2025.

art
  • 07 January 2026
  • Commercial Real Estate

Real Estate: update and 2026 expectations

The previous year has been an eventful one for the commercial property sector.

art
  • 06 January 2026
  • Commercial Real Estate

FAQ – Buying a commercial property in England and Wales

If you want to invest in the commercial property market in England and Wales (the two countries share the same jurisdiction), it is important to understand that the process differs significantly from buying a property in France.

art
  • 05 January 2026
  • Immigration

UK Immigration changes in 2025: What to expect in 2026

This wrap-up brings together the key developments from across the year, highlighting what has changed, what is still evolving, and what organisations should be planning for as we move into 2026.

Pub
  • 01 January 2026
  • Public Procurement

Procurement Challenges under the Procurement Act 2023

Taking prompt advice is essential as unsuccessful bidders have just ten days within which to issue court proceedings if they want to benefit from the automatic suspension provided for in the Regulations, which prevents the contracting authority from awarding the contract to anyone else.