Search

How can we help?

Icon

Employee succeeds in whistleblowing claim following complaint about offensive “banter”

The Claimant in Robinson v Mind Monmouthshire Ltd made a complaint after a colleague performed an offensive impression of a physically disabled person.

Following this, the Claimant was isolated by her colleagues who continued engaging in offensive workplace ‘banter’ and she suffered a period of mental ill health.

At a subsequent capability meeting, the Claimant’s manager did not act on OH’s recommendation that the Claimant should not return to the same working environment and advised her to raise a grievance. Her grievances however were not upheld and she resigned.

The Tribunal unanimously found the Claimant had been automatically unfairly dismissed for making a protected disclosure. It held her disclosure regarding a failure to comply with a legal obligation (relating to equality law in the workplace) was inextricably linked to the treatment she then suffered.

The ET further held the Claimant had been victimised following her complaint as the Respondent had failed to address the incident, had applied a culture of isolation, and had failed to make reasonable adjustments by not acting on OH’s recommendations.

 

The Tribunal unanimously found the Claimant had been automatically unfairly dismissed for making a protected disclosure

The case reminds employers of the dangers of workplace “banter” and highlights the importance of fully investigating any related complaints and ensuring that individuals are not subjected to any detrimental treatment for making protected disclosures.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 09 December 2024
  • Corporate and M&A

UK Directors’ Responsibilities

On becoming a director of a company, directors undertake to comply with various duties and responsibilities. which are specified in the Companies Act 2006. In this article, we will explain how you can comply with these practical responsibilities.

art
  • 09 December 2024
  • Commercial Real Estate

What happens to a sublease when the headlease is surrendered, forfeited or disclaimed?

The intermediate tenant under the headlease falls away and the tenant under the sublease becomes the direct tenant of the superior landlord.

art
  • 09 December 2024
  • Employment

Mistletoe and Missteps: Preventing Harassment at Christmas Parties

As the festive season approaches, offices are coming together for their annual Christmas parties, offering a chance to unwind and celebrate the year’s achievements. However, whilst these events provide a necessary release and recognition of employee’s contributions, they also present a heightened risk of inappropriate behaviour, particularly sexual harassment.

art
  • 03 December 2024
  • Immigration

UPDATE – Ministers to postpone full eVisa rollout amid fears of UK residents being stranded abroad

The UK government will postpone the full transition to eVisas, initially planned for 1 January 2025, following concerns that system glitches could leave UK residents stranded abroad.

art
  • 02 December 2024
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

The Era of AI

In this recent case, the First-Tier Tribunal gave a stark warning to litigants about use of AI in litigation.

art
  • 28 November 2024
  • Employment

Employment Rights Bill: The Regulatory Policy Committee opinion

This article considers the Regulatory Policy Committee’s recently published opinion on the impact assessments for the Employment Rights Bill. The Committee assessed the quality of evidence and analysis used to inform the government proposals and came to the overall opinion that the impact assessments are currently “not fit for purpose”.