Search

How can we help?

Icon

Employee succeeds in whistleblowing claim following complaint about offensive “banter”

The Claimant in Robinson v Mind Monmouthshire Ltd made a complaint after a colleague performed an offensive impression of a physically disabled person.

Following this, the Claimant was isolated by her colleagues who continued engaging in offensive workplace ‘banter’ and she suffered a period of mental ill health.

At a subsequent capability meeting, the Claimant’s manager did not act on OH’s recommendation that the Claimant should not return to the same working environment and advised her to raise a grievance. Her grievances however were not upheld and she resigned.

The Tribunal unanimously found the Claimant had been automatically unfairly dismissed for making a protected disclosure. It held her disclosure regarding a failure to comply with a legal obligation (relating to equality law in the workplace) was inextricably linked to the treatment she then suffered.

The ET further held the Claimant had been victimised following her complaint as the Respondent had failed to address the incident, had applied a culture of isolation, and had failed to make reasonable adjustments by not acting on OH’s recommendations.

 

The Tribunal unanimously found the Claimant had been automatically unfairly dismissed for making a protected disclosure

The case reminds employers of the dangers of workplace “banter” and highlights the importance of fully investigating any related complaints and ensuring that individuals are not subjected to any detrimental treatment for making protected disclosures.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 28 August 2026
  • Immigration

Right to Work and Sponsor Licence Changes 2026: Key dates for businesses

In this podcast, immigration solicitors Ruth Karimatsenga and Monica Mastropasqua discuss the key immigration compliance changes coming into force in September and October 2026 and what employers, HR teams, sponsors and individuals should do to prepare.

art
  • 28 August 2026
  • Commercial Real Estate

Modernising security of tenure: The Law Commission’s follow up consultation paper

On 16th June 2026, the Commission published its second consultation paper: Business Tenancies: the right to renew – modernising security of tenure.

Pub
  • 27 August 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

The Highly Expedited Arbitration Provisions – ICC Rules 2026 – Factsheet

This factsheet provides an overview of the ICC’s Highly Expedited Arbitration Provisions (HEAP), outlining some of the key procedural features introduced by Appendix VI of the 2026 Rules and the potential benefits of this new expedited process.

art
  • 27 August 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

EMIs – April 2026 changes explained

On 6 April 2026 the Enterprise Management Incentive scheme (EMI) was expanded to make EMIs accessible to a wider range of businesses.

art
  • 19 August 2026
  • Employment

Managing employee redundancies: Frequently asked questions (FAQs)

Redundancy should be an employer’s last option when restructuring their business. There are necessary steps that should be taken to ensure that redundancy is the best move forward

art
  • 18 August 2026
  • Immigration

Home Office curtailment of Sponsored Workers’ permission: Why employers and employees must act quickly

The Home Office has recently changed the speed at which it processes sponsor notifications following the end of a sponsored worker’s employment.