Search

How can we help?

Icon

Employee succeeds in whistleblowing claim following complaint about offensive “banter”

The Claimant in Robinson v Mind Monmouthshire Ltd made a complaint after a colleague performed an offensive impression of a physically disabled person.

Following this, the Claimant was isolated by her colleagues who continued engaging in offensive workplace ‘banter’ and she suffered a period of mental ill health.

At a subsequent capability meeting, the Claimant’s manager did not act on OH’s recommendation that the Claimant should not return to the same working environment and advised her to raise a grievance. Her grievances however were not upheld and she resigned.

The Tribunal unanimously found the Claimant had been automatically unfairly dismissed for making a protected disclosure. It held her disclosure regarding a failure to comply with a legal obligation (relating to equality law in the workplace) was inextricably linked to the treatment she then suffered.

The ET further held the Claimant had been victimised following her complaint as the Respondent had failed to address the incident, had applied a culture of isolation, and had failed to make reasonable adjustments by not acting on OH’s recommendations.

 

The Tribunal unanimously found the Claimant had been automatically unfairly dismissed for making a protected disclosure

The case reminds employers of the dangers of workplace “banter” and highlights the importance of fully investigating any related complaints and ensuring that individuals are not subjected to any detrimental treatment for making protected disclosures.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 16 March 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Shareholder Disputes: Managing Shareholder Buyouts and Exits – Episode 3

Join Stuart Mullins and Nicky Goringe Larkin for the third and final episode of our Shareholder Disputes series, where we move from prevention to resolution—exploring what happens when a founder’s exit becomes unavoidable.

art
  • 13 March 2026
  • Employment

When Immigration compliance becomes discrimination: The UK’s uncomfortable workplace balance

UK employers today operate under powerful, and some may say conflicting, legal pressures. On one hand, they must prevent illegal working under UK immigration laws.

art
  • 09 March 2026
  • Commercial Real Estate

Commercial Rent Deposits – A brief overview

A rent deposit is money provided by a tenant to its landlord as security for payment of the rent and performance of the tenant’s covenants contained in the lease.

art
  • 03 March 2026
  • Employment

International Women’s Day 2026 – Supporting equality and inclusion for a better, happier workforce

This year, International Women’s Day is inviting everyone to think differently about equality and how it can benefit everyone. The theme this year is ‘Give to Gain’.

art
  • 02 March 2026
  • Employment

10 facts an employer should know about holding personal data

Personal data is any information that can be used to identify an employee.

art
  • 27 February 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

How (not!) to serve a winding up petition on a company using a default address

This case concerned an appeal by DG Resources Ltd (“DG”) on the basis that a winding up petition brought by HMRC (the “Petition”) was invalidly served.