Search

How can we help?

Icon

Use of devices at work: ACAS recognises need for guidance on “bring your own” policy

ACAS has recently published limited guidance in relation to bringing your own device to work policies, or ‘BYOD’ for short.  Such a policy essentially covers the use of personal mobile phones and computers etc in the office or for work purposes.  Although this has its advantages, it could also throw up a number of problems for both employers and employees.

Social media has become ever more prevalent, not only in people’s personal lives but also in their working lives, as well as being used increasingly by companies for business purposes – Facebook and Twitter are now seen as essential business tools in many organisations.  Naturally this has resulted in a drastic increase of gadget purchasing, with smartphones and tablets becoming more and more commonplace in households.  Therefore, some would consider it to make perfect sense for those household devices to be taken to and used in the workplace – this saves businesses from purchasing additional devices at their own expense (clearly an important consideration in the current economic climate, especially for small business) and allows individuals to use items they are familiar with as and when convenient to them, although many employees may expect a financial incentive for using their own devices as opposed to company ones.

If a BYOD policy is not carefully drafted, there are potentially damaging consequences.  Security always has to be a priority, both for employees and for the content on the devices.  Employers have data protection and confidentiality obligations and if a device is misplaced or lost this could lead to a breach in those obligations.  As the devices would also be for personal use, they could be corrupted as a result of internet browsing or downloads which are unrelated to work.  It may also leave devices more vulnerable to hackers.

Monica Atwal

Managing Partner

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

If a BYOD policy is not carefully drafted, there are potentially damaging consequences.

The possible consequences also extend post-employment – many organisations require employees to delete or return sensitive or confidential information they may have acquired during employment.  It is much more difficult to ensure this has been done where the device belongs to the individual and not the company.

The ACAS guidance therefore suggests that a BYOD policy should clearly separate business and personal use on the devices, making it easier to manage and monitor.  It also suggests considering inclusion of a provision to allow sensitive data to be remotely deleted if necessary, which would reduce the problems associated with lost devices or those belonging to ex-employees.  Devices should also be secured by a password.

To view the ACAS guidance please follow this link: Dealing with problems at work | Acas

 

About this article

Disclaimer

This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Monica Atwal

Managing Partner

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 09 December 2024
  • Employment

Mistletoe and Missteps: Preventing Harassment at Christmas Parties

As the festive season approaches, offices are coming together for their annual Christmas parties, offering a chance to unwind and celebrate the year’s achievements. However, whilst these events provide a necessary release and recognition of employee’s contributions, they also present a heightened risk of inappropriate behaviour, particularly sexual harassment.

art
  • 28 November 2024
  • Employment

Employment Rights Bill: The Regulatory Policy Committee opinion

This article considers the Regulatory Policy Committee’s recently published opinion on the impact assessments for the Employment Rights Bill. The Committee assessed the quality of evidence and analysis used to inform the government proposals and came to the overall opinion that the impact assessments are currently “not fit for purpose”.

art
  • 19 November 2024
  • Employment

Booting out discrimination: Referee David Coote suspended over alleged derogatory comments

It has recently been reported that referee David Coote has been suspended with immediate effect, pending a full investigation, after making derogatory comments. In this article, we will focus on the alleged discriminatory comments made and learnings from this. Given that the matter is currently being investigated, it will be a big case to watch, as if the allegations are proven, what action could be taken against Mr Coote?

art
  • 13 November 2024
  • Employment

Modern Slavery Act 2015: Select Committee calls on the Government for change

The article will cover the House of Lords Modern Slavery Act 2015 Committee’s recent report and key recommendations following its inquiry into the impact and effectiveness of the Modern Slavery Act.

art
  • 12 November 2024
  • Employment

Redundancies on the Rise: What alternatives are available?

As we move into the second half of the year, and with the cost-of-living crisis not yet showing signs of easing, many businesses are feeling the pinch and are exploring their options in a bid to save costs.

art
  • 11 November 2024
  • Employment

Clarkslegal welcomes a new employment partner

Clarkslegal is delighted to announce the appointment of Katie Glendinning as a partner within our highly-ranked employment team.