Search

How can we help?

Icon

Urgent procurement in a pandemic

Depending on the value and size of the contract, a typical procurement run in accordance with the requirements of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 can take anything from a few months to more than a year to conclude.

Regulation 32(2)(c) does however provide an exception for contracts which are required for reasons of extreme urgency brought about by events unforeseeable by the contracting authority. Where this exception applies and it is not possible for the time limits for the open, restricted or competitive negotiation procedures to be used as a result of that urgency, a public body may award a contract using the negotiated procedure without advertising it and following the usual procurement processes.

Depending on the value and size of the contract, a typical procurement run in accordance with the requirements of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 can take anything from a few months to more than a year to conclude.

The COVID-19 pandemic was unprecedented and many contracting authorities have, since March 2020, relied on the Regulation 32(2)(c) exception to award urgent pandemic-related contracts without running a full regulated tender. Providing the conditions of Regulation 32 are met, this is permitted. However, contracting authorities need to be very careful to ensure that they do not abuse the Regulation 32(2)(c) exception, the requirements of which are as follows:

  1. There is extreme urgency;
  2. The extreme urgency has been brought about by events which were unforeseeable by the contracting authority;
  3. The time limits for regulated tenders cannot be complied with;
  4. The extreme urgency is not attributable in any way to the contracting authority.

In addition, contracts may only be awarded insofar as they are strictly necessary.

During the course of the pandemic, contracting authorities have relied on Regulation 32(2)(c) to award a large number of contracts worth many billions of pounds, including in particular contracts for the supply of PPE and for lab testing. Both the size and scale of these direct awards, and the process adopted by contracting authorities in awarding them, have been subject to media scrutiny and, in some cases, legal challenge by bidders.

Whilst it may be legitimate for contracting authorities to use Regulation 32(2)(c) in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, contracting authorities must be careful to ensure that their decisions are properly documented; that the contracts awarded do not go further than strictly necessary; and the process adopted complies with general EU Treaty principles of equality, transparency and proportionality. Contracting authorities should also be aware that as the pandemic continues, reliance on Regulation 32(2)(c) will become more difficult as the effects of the virus can no longer be described as unforeseeable.

On the other side of the coin, bidders should keep under review the contracts directly awarded by contracting authorities, which must be published on Contracts Finder and in OJEU, currently, and post-Brexit on the new UK Find a Tender service, which will go live on 1 January 2021. If bidders feel they have missed out on a valuable opportunity, they should take early legal advice in order to determine whether they may have any grounds for challenging a direct award.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 01 June 2023
  • Employment

Facts employees should know about their personal data

We previously published an article on facts an employer should know about holding personal data, so it is only fair that we also write about the other side of the coin – facts employees should know as individuals whose personal data is held by their employer.

art
  • 01 June 2023
  • Immigration

What is the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) and how much do you have to pay?

The Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) is a levy on companies who sponsor migrant workers. This levy was imposed on 6 April 2017. The Government states that the charge has been levied to contribute towards addressing the skills gap in the local economy.

art
  • 26 May 2023
  • Employment

Avoiding discrimination in flexible working requests

The right to request flexible working is currently available to employees with at least 26 weeks’ service and is set to be extended further under new Government reforms.

art
  • 25 May 2023
  • Corporate and M&A

Management Buyout – Top 5 things to consider

A management buyout is a financial transaction in which a member of the management team purchases the company from its registered owner. MBO’s usually occur in private companies in an effort to enhance profitability and simplify strategies.

art
  • 25 May 2023
  • Employment

Carer’s Leave Bill set to become law

On 19 May 2023, the Carer’s Leave Bill had its third reading in the House of Lords, and upon receiving Royal Assent, will become law. There is not yet a date for the implementation of this bill, however it is likely that this will happen relatively quickly upon receiving Royal Assent, so is definitely one to keep an eye on.

art
  • 18 May 2023
  • Immigration

Navigating SOC Codes

When it comes to UK immigration, understanding the intricacies of the system is vital. One significant aspect of the process revolves around Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) codes. SOC codes play a crucial role in determining the eligibility for an individual to apply for a work visa, assessing skill levels, and matching individuals to appropriate job roles.