Search

How can we help?

Icon

Union bids for recognition with end user not employer

This week a trade union, IWGB, has applied for statutory recognition to represent a group of receptionists, security officers and porters who work at the University of London even though these workers are employed by Cordant Security, a facilities management company with the contract to provide services to the University.

The union has described the University as the “de facto employer” and asserted that UK law, if it prevents these workers from collectively bargaining directly with the University, is in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

Even if the financial terms of Cordant’s contract with the University place a practical limit on Cordant’s scope for increasing the pay of these workers, and University managers can instruct Cordant employees to carry out certain tasks, it is very difficult to see how the union can substantiate its claim that the University is the “de facto employer” unless there is evidence that Cordant is not the actual employer responsible for matters such as hiring, pay, disciplinaries and grievances.

 

The union has described the University as the “de facto employer” and asserted that UK law, if it prevents these workers from collectively bargaining directly with the University, is in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

It will therefore be very surprising if this application results in either a finding that the union can negotiate directly with the University or that UK law is in breach of ECHR.

There is no suggestion that there is anything preventing the union from seeking recognition by Cordant, provided it meets the statutory tests. The union has in fact done so, albeit without media fanfare, at the same time as its application for direct recognition by the University.

This is an interesting one to keep track of…watch this space for updates as this progresses.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 28 August 2026
  • Immigration

Right to Work and Sponsor Licence Changes 2026: Key dates for businesses

In this podcast, immigration solicitors Ruth Karimatsenga and Monica Mastropasqua discuss the key immigration compliance changes coming into force in September and October 2026 and what employers, HR teams, sponsors and individuals should do to prepare.

art
  • 28 August 2026
  • Commercial Real Estate

Modernising security of tenure: The Law Commission’s follow up consultation paper

On 16th June 2026, the Commission published its second consultation paper: Business Tenancies: the right to renew – modernising security of tenure.

Pub
  • 27 August 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

The Highly Expedited Arbitration Provisions – ICC Rules 2026 – Factsheet

This factsheet provides an overview of the ICC’s Highly Expedited Arbitration Provisions (HEAP), outlining some of the key procedural features introduced by Appendix VI of the 2026 Rules and the potential benefits of this new expedited process.

art
  • 27 August 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

EMIs – April 2026 changes explained

On 6 April 2026 the Enterprise Management Incentive scheme (EMI) was expanded to make EMIs accessible to a wider range of businesses.

art
  • 19 August 2026
  • Employment

Managing employee redundancies: Frequently asked questions (FAQs)

Redundancy should be an employer’s last option when restructuring their business. There are necessary steps that should be taken to ensure that redundancy is the best move forward

art
  • 18 August 2026
  • Immigration

Home Office curtailment of Sponsored Workers’ permission: Why employers and employees must act quickly

The Home Office has recently changed the speed at which it processes sponsor notifications following the end of a sponsored worker’s employment.