Search

How can we help?

Icon

Union bids for recognition with end user not employer

This week a trade union, IWGB, has applied for statutory recognition to represent a group of receptionists, security officers and porters who work at the University of London even though these workers are employed by Cordant Security, a facilities management company with the contract to provide services to the University.

The union has described the University as the “de facto employer” and asserted that UK law, if it prevents these workers from collectively bargaining directly with the University, is in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

Even if the financial terms of Cordant’s contract with the University place a practical limit on Cordant’s scope for increasing the pay of these workers, and University managers can instruct Cordant employees to carry out certain tasks, it is very difficult to see how the union can substantiate its claim that the University is the “de facto employer” unless there is evidence that Cordant is not the actual employer responsible for matters such as hiring, pay, disciplinaries and grievances.

 

The union has described the University as the “de facto employer” and asserted that UK law, if it prevents these workers from collectively bargaining directly with the University, is in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

It will therefore be very surprising if this application results in either a finding that the union can negotiate directly with the University or that UK law is in breach of ECHR.

There is no suggestion that there is anything preventing the union from seeking recognition by Cordant, provided it meets the statutory tests. The union has in fact done so, albeit without media fanfare, at the same time as its application for direct recognition by the University.

This is an interesting one to keep track of…watch this space for updates as this progresses.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 09 July 2026
  • Immigration

Right to Work Checks are changing from 1 October 2026: Is your business ready?

The Home Office’s new rules, effective 1 October 2026, will overhaul right to work checks and raise the risk of civil penalties for UK businesses.

art
  • 08 July 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

ICO prosecutes employee under the Data Protection Act for forwarding client data to his personal email address

The issue of employees taking confidential business information or personal data when moving to a new employer remains a significant concern for businesses.

Pub
  • 07 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Accelerating arbitration: Expedited procedures and key changes in the new ICC Rules – Episode 2

In episode 2, Jack Hobbs (Clarkslegal) and Christopher Howitt (Three Stone) explore how the latest expedited and highly expedited procedures under the ICC Arbitration Rules 2026 are transforming the landscape of dispute resolution.

art
  • 07 July 2026
  • Employment

6 month unfair dismissal rights: What employers need to know

Under the new Employment Rights Act 2025 the minimum period of service required to qualify to bring a statutory claim for unfair dismissal has been reduced from 2 full years to 6 months from 1 January 2027 onwards.  

art
  • 02 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Litigation and Artificial Intelligence: Where are we now?

In the recent case of Cork and another v Smith, the High Court publicly admonished a law firm and two of its solicitors after they had produced and submitted two AI-generated letters to the court containing misleading and false information in relation to a block transfer application made under Rule 12.37 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016.

Pub
  • 30 June 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Overview of the new ICC Arbitration Rules: Key changes – Episode 1

In this episode, Jack Hobbs (Clarkslegal) and Christopher Howitt (Three Stone) discuss the major updates in the ICC Arbitration Rules 2026 and what they mean for practitioners, clients, and the future of international arbitration.