Search

How can we help?

Icon

Union bids for recognition with end user not employer

This week a trade union, IWGB, has applied for statutory recognition to represent a group of receptionists, security officers and porters who work at the University of London even though these workers are employed by Cordant Security, a facilities management company with the contract to provide services to the University.

The union has described the University as the “de facto employer” and asserted that UK law, if it prevents these workers from collectively bargaining directly with the University, is in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

Even if the financial terms of Cordant’s contract with the University place a practical limit on Cordant’s scope for increasing the pay of these workers, and University managers can instruct Cordant employees to carry out certain tasks, it is very difficult to see how the union can substantiate its claim that the University is the “de facto employer” unless there is evidence that Cordant is not the actual employer responsible for matters such as hiring, pay, disciplinaries and grievances.

 

The union has described the University as the “de facto employer” and asserted that UK law, if it prevents these workers from collectively bargaining directly with the University, is in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

It will therefore be very surprising if this application results in either a finding that the union can negotiate directly with the University or that UK law is in breach of ECHR.

There is no suggestion that there is anything preventing the union from seeking recognition by Cordant, provided it meets the statutory tests. The union has in fact done so, albeit without media fanfare, at the same time as its application for direct recognition by the University.

This is an interesting one to keep track of…watch this space for updates as this progresses.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 10 December 2025
  • Privacy and Data Protection

The 12 Data Protection Mistakes of Christmas

As the festive season approaches, it is not just last-minute shopping and office parties that can catch organisations off guard; data protection slip-ups are just as common.

Pub
  • 04 December 2025
  • Immigration

UK Immigration: What to expect in 2026 for employers

Join our UK immigration specialists, Ruth Karimatsenga and Monica Mastropasqua, as they explore the key updates and how they affect your business in 2026.

Pub
  • 04 December 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

Autumn Budget 2025 Breakdown: Key takeaways for business buyers and sellers

Join Stuart Mullins and Nicky Goringe Larkin as they delve into the key updates from the Chancellor’s announcement, with a focus on what matters most for businesses looking to buy and sell.

art
  • 03 December 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

Why is carrying out a legal Due Diligence investigation necessary during an proposed acquisition?

Merging with or acquiring another company is a high-stakes endeavour. The purpose, process and common areas of investigation during a M&A transaction.

art
  • 02 December 2025
  • Employment

All I Want for Christmas… Is No Tribunal Claims!

Before the festivities begin, it is worth unwrapping the key risks and understanding how employers can protect their staff, their reputation and their sanity, while still delivering a thoroughly enjoyable evening.

art
  • 01 December 2025
  • Immigration

Government consultation on extending settlement requirements: What employers and migrants need to know

This article summarises the key proposals , groups who will and will not be affected by the extending settlement requirements, and the potential impact for employers, workers and families.