Search

How can we help?

Icon

Union bids for recognition with end user not employer

This week a trade union, IWGB, has applied for statutory recognition to represent a group of receptionists, security officers and porters who work at the University of London even though these workers are employed by Cordant Security, a facilities management company with the contract to provide services to the University.

The union has described the University as the “de facto employer” and asserted that UK law, if it prevents these workers from collectively bargaining directly with the University, is in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

Even if the financial terms of Cordant’s contract with the University place a practical limit on Cordant’s scope for increasing the pay of these workers, and University managers can instruct Cordant employees to carry out certain tasks, it is very difficult to see how the union can substantiate its claim that the University is the “de facto employer” unless there is evidence that Cordant is not the actual employer responsible for matters such as hiring, pay, disciplinaries and grievances.

 

The union has described the University as the “de facto employer” and asserted that UK law, if it prevents these workers from collectively bargaining directly with the University, is in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

It will therefore be very surprising if this application results in either a finding that the union can negotiate directly with the University or that UK law is in breach of ECHR.

There is no suggestion that there is anything preventing the union from seeking recognition by Cordant, provided it meets the statutory tests. The union has in fact done so, albeit without media fanfare, at the same time as its application for direct recognition by the University.

This is an interesting one to keep track of…watch this space for updates as this progresses.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 21 January 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

FAQs – Data Subject Access Requests

Any individual who may be identified from any form of document, whether directly or indirectly, is a data subject.

art
  • 20 January 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Positioning Your Business for Growth and Exit in 2026

2025 proved another challenging year for SMEs in the UK, with regulatory reform for Companies, increased taxes and operating costs and geopolitical pressure making for a harsh trading environment, Yet, despite the gloomy economic outlook, dealmaking in the region remained robust.

Pub
  • 20 January 2026
  • Immigration

UK Immigration: What to expect in 2026 for employers

Join our UK immigration specialists, Ruth Karimatsenga and Monica Mastropasqua, for an on-demand webinar as they discuss the key updates and their impact on your business in 2026.

Pub
  • 15 January 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Quarterly Insights: Key Corporate & Commercial Topics – Q1 2026

Join Stuart Mullins and Jonathan Hayes as they explore the most topical issues and key developments our team has examined over the past three months. In Episode 1, they discuss Family Investment Companies, Legal Due Diligence, and Directors’ Duties.

Pub
  • 08 January 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Data Protection Audits: Launch Event

Join us for a breakfast networking session on Thursday 26th February 2026 as we officially launch our Data Protection Audit services.

art
  • 08 January 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Data Protection – what’s happened in 2025?

2025 has been a lively year for the data protection sphere, with the main talking point coming from the UK’s data reform Bill finally receiving Royal Assent on 19 June 2025.