Search

How can we help?

Icon

Unfair dismissal due to trade union activities

In the recent case of Cadent Gas Ltd v Singh the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has upheld a tribunal decision that an employee was automatically unfairly dismissed because of his trade union activities despite the fact that the disciplinary and appeal officers were not motivated by his union activities.

The Claimant was a health and safety trade union representative and a key element of his case was that the manager who conducted the disciplinary investigation into allegations of gross misconduct (which were unconnected to his union activities) was hostile towards the union of which the Claimant was part. There had also been historical tension between the two in relation to the Claimant’s trade union activities.

Although it was considered that neither the disciplinary nor the appeal officers were motivated in their decision-making by the employee’s union activities, it was found that the investigating manager had referred to the Claimant’s union status in his investigation and, amongst other things, had given incorrect information to HR and the dismissing officer. The decision to dismiss was therefore found to be attributable to the Claimant’s union activities.

Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has upheld a tribunal decision that an employee was automatically unfairly dismissed because of his trade union activities.

This case highlights the high degree of risk in trade union cases and employers must be aware of the serious implications if an employee is dismissed or subjected to a detriment because of their involvement in, or connection to, a trade union. Employers must also be aware that such cases do not require a minimum length of service, compensation for such dismissals is uncapped and serious reputational damage could be caused if a Claimant is successful.

If you have any concerns regarding trade union matters, please contact a member of our unfair dismissal lawyers who will be happy to assist.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 26 November 2025
  • Employment

The Data Use and Access Act 2025 – how to handle data protection complaints

This article will focus on, in particular, the requirement for data controllers to ensure that, by June 2026, appropriate complaint procedures are put in place (s 103).

art
  • 20 November 2025
  • Immigration

The Innovator Founder Visa: What It Is & How Recent Home Office Changes Empower Student Entrepreneurs

The UK’s Innovator Founder visa is designed to attract ambitious entrepreneurs who can build innovative, viable, and scalable businesses in the UK.

art
  • 18 November 2025
  • Employment

Employment Rights Bill – Enhanced protections for pregnant women and new mothers

The Employment Rights Bill will make it unlawful to dismiss pregnant women, mothers on maternity leave and mothers who return to work for at least six months after they return to work, expect for specific circumstances.

art
  • 12 November 2025
  • Employment

GDPR: Who are data controllers and processors?

Controllers and processors have a different set of responsibilities, and have various responsibilities when dealing with data breaches.

Pub
  • 11 November 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

The Autumn Budget 2025: Key considerations for business buyers and sellers

Join Stuart Mullins and Nicky Goringe Larkin as they discuss some of the likely implications of the Autumn Budget 2025 for those looking to buy and sell businesses.

art
  • 11 November 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

Directors Duties: Honesty and Goodfaith 

In June the Court of Appeal found that a director had failed to comply with their statutory duty.