Search

How can we help?

Icon

UK Visas and Technology

The Home Office is serious about incorporating technology in its immigration process. The advent and expansion of e-gates, the introduction of online applications and the implementation of the EU Settlement Scheme using NFC-mobile phones is all part of the Home Office’s drive to automate and digitize its procedure.

In May 2019, the Home Office advertised for a Director of Immigration Technology. The purpose of this role was to spearhead the technological advancements of UK Visas & Immigration (UKVI), the Immigration part of the Home Office.

The Home Office has always struggled in dealing with immigration applications efficiently. The UK’s immigration law is extremely complex, and this has resulted in lengthy paper application forms to obtain the information from a prospective applicant. The end-result has been lengthy processing times and an overwhelming number of incorrect decisions being overturned on appeal/review. This then has a knock-on effect on the Courts system who are left to determine these appeals, which again take months to decide.

As such, the Home Office has always looked toward technology to improve its current system and to make its systems more efficient. This has not always gone according to plan, for example the failed e-borders project took 8 year for delivery cost the Home Office millions of pounds.

However, the tides seem to be turning. The EU Settlement Scheme (EUSS) is the Home Office’s latest project and is thought to be a pilot project to widen digital immigration applications. The EUSS is a complete paperless solution which relies on Near Field Communication (NFC) technology to verify identity. This is followed by automated check on HMRC and DWP databases using the National Insurance number. This means in most cases the applicant does not need to provide any further supporting evidence (compared to the EEA PR application which often resulted in hundreds of pages of financial documents spanning 5-years).

The end-result is that most applications are being considered in a matter of days (compared to the previous 6-month processing time for EEA Permanent Residence applications).

It is expected that other immigration applications will also incorporate a similar use of technology. The Home Office has already moved most of these applications online, which means a tailored application form, and provides for supporting documents to be scanned prior to or at the biometric appointment. In most cases, the passport does not need to be sent, as it can be checked by UKVI’s commercial partner, Sopra Steria, at the Biometric appointments.

The Home Office is serious about incorporating technology in its immigration process.

The use of technology is not limited to immigration applications and the use of automated e-gates is one example. These gates have been very successful and are arguably more secure then the manual checking of passports by an Immigration Officer. This technology again relies on the chip found in e-passports and matches this with a facial image. This has led to immigration officers focusing more on high-risk cases and a reduction in passenger time spent at the UK border.

The use of technology is, however, not without its criticisms. The increasing use of automated systems and algorithms have come under scrutiny, which critics warn could be discriminating against some applicants. The policy behind these algorithms has not been disclosed and therefore it is difficult to assess the extent of the risks involved.

One thing is however certain, the Home Office is serious about its use of technology, and this may be because of the benefits it has already seen in some application. In the coming years, we can expect all applications to have an element of automation and digitisation to them.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

Monica Atwal

Managing Partner

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 09 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

The Arbitration Act 2025 – Factsheet

This factsheet outlines the major reforms and key developments introduced by the Arbitration Act 2025, including updates on summary disposal, jurisdictional challenges, emergency arbitrators, arbitrator disclosure duties, and governing law in arbitration proceedings.

art
  • 09 July 2026
  • Immigration

Right to Work Checks are changing from 1 October 2026: Is your business ready?

The Home Office’s new rules, effective 1 October 2026, will overhaul right to work checks and raise the risk of civil penalties for UK businesses.

art
  • 08 July 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

ICO prosecutes employee under the Data Protection Act for forwarding client data to his personal email address

The issue of employees taking confidential business information or personal data when moving to a new employer remains a significant concern for businesses.

Pub
  • 07 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Accelerating arbitration: Expedited procedures and key changes in the new ICC Rules – Episode 2

In episode 2, Jack Hobbs (Clarkslegal) and Christopher Howitt (Three Stone) explore how the latest expedited and highly expedited procedures under the ICC Arbitration Rules 2026 are transforming the landscape of dispute resolution.

art
  • 07 July 2026
  • Employment

6 month unfair dismissal rights: What employers need to know

Under the new Employment Rights Act 2025 the minimum period of service required to qualify to bring a statutory claim for unfair dismissal has been reduced from 2 full years to 6 months from 1 January 2027 onwards.  

art
  • 02 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Litigation and Artificial Intelligence: Where are we now?

In the recent case of Cork and another v Smith, the High Court publicly admonished a law firm and two of its solicitors after they had produced and submitted two AI-generated letters to the court containing misleading and false information in relation to a block transfer application made under Rule 12.37 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016.