Search

How can we help?

Icon

Tribunal Fees: Resurrecting rejected claims?

The Supreme Court decision on 26 July 2017 that Employment Tribunal fees were unlawful was expected to have wide-ranging repercussions.

This week, one further likely consequence of the decision has been highlighted.

Between July 2013 and July 2017, an issue fee was payable when an ET claim was started and a further fee was payable in order to proceed to final hearing.

At the issue stage, Claimants could submit their claim without paying and apply for the fee to be waived. For this application to succeed, the Claimant had to prove their income and/or assets were below a certain level. Claimants whose applications were unsuccessful and did not pay the fee would have their claims rejected or dismissed for non-payment of fees.

At the hearing fee stage, where the Claimant did not pay the fee and had not successfully applied for the fees to be waived, the claim would be rejected or dismissed.

Now that the fees regime has been found to have been unlawful from its introduction, there is an opportunity for individuals whose claims were rejected or dismissed for non-payment of fees to apply to the ET for their claims to be reinstated.

 

At the hearing fee stage, where the Claimant did not pay the fee and had not successfully applied for the fees to be waived, the claim would be rejected or dismissed.

This week, the Presidents of the Employment Tribunals have ordered that decisions on this kind of case will be put on hold until the Ministry of Justice and HMCTS (the courts and tribunals service) decides how to handle this issue.

While this introduces new uncertainty regarding complaints which businesses probably thought were historic, it is important to clarify that it will not reopen matters which have been settled by settlement agreement or via ACAS.

If you are concerned about how this may impact you or your business, please contact our employment team.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 11 June 2026
  • Immigration

MAC report reveals who stays in the UK on the Skilled Worker Route – Key insights for employers

Key insights from the MAC report: Who stays in the UK on the Skilled Worker route? Essential findings and takeaways for employers.

art
  • 08 June 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

FAQs – Privacy Documentation

Clearly documenting and regularly reviewing data protection policies and procedures is paramount to demonstrating compliance with the UK GDPR. It is essential that such policies are communicated within an entity and staff are regularly trained on these.

art
  • 03 June 2026
  • Employment

Holiday Pay Record Keeping – What this new duty means for employers

The Employment Rights Act 2025 made certain changes to the rules around holiday records, which came into effect on 6th April 2026.

art
  • 03 June 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Is your Company’s Register of Members accurate? The hidden risks of getting it wrong

Ensure your company’s Register of Members is accurate and compliant. Learn the legal risks, common mistakes, and how to protect your business from penalties.

art
  • 02 June 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Clarkslegal welcomes leading Corporate Law expert Mark Ridley as Partner

Clarkslegal is delighted to announce the appointment of Mark Ridley as a new Partner in the Corporate and Commercial team.

art
  • 28 May 2026

Newly rebranded legal services group Orwins makes investment in Clarkslegal

Orwins, the law firm for ambitious businesses and high net worth individuals, has today, 27 May 2026, announced a significant investment in Reading-based commercial law firm Clarkslegal.