Search

How can we help?

Icon

Tribunal Fees: Resurrecting rejected claims?

The Supreme Court decision on 26 July 2017 that Employment Tribunal fees were unlawful was expected to have wide-ranging repercussions.

This week, one further likely consequence of the decision has been highlighted.

Between July 2013 and July 2017, an issue fee was payable when an ET claim was started and a further fee was payable in order to proceed to final hearing.

At the issue stage, Claimants could submit their claim without paying and apply for the fee to be waived. For this application to succeed, the Claimant had to prove their income and/or assets were below a certain level. Claimants whose applications were unsuccessful and did not pay the fee would have their claims rejected or dismissed for non-payment of fees.

At the hearing fee stage, where the Claimant did not pay the fee and had not successfully applied for the fees to be waived, the claim would be rejected or dismissed.

Now that the fees regime has been found to have been unlawful from its introduction, there is an opportunity for individuals whose claims were rejected or dismissed for non-payment of fees to apply to the ET for their claims to be reinstated.

 

At the hearing fee stage, where the Claimant did not pay the fee and had not successfully applied for the fees to be waived, the claim would be rejected or dismissed.

This week, the Presidents of the Employment Tribunals have ordered that decisions on this kind of case will be put on hold until the Ministry of Justice and HMCTS (the courts and tribunals service) decides how to handle this issue.

While this introduces new uncertainty regarding complaints which businesses probably thought were historic, it is important to clarify that it will not reopen matters which have been settled by settlement agreement or via ACAS.

If you are concerned about how this may impact you or your business, please contact our employment team.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 18 June 2025
  • Employment

Pride Month: How Can You Celebrate as an Employer

The UK held its first Pride Parade in 1972, inspired by events held in major American cities following the Stonewall rebellion in New York in June 1969.

Pub
  • 16 June 2025
  • Privacy and Data Protection

WhatsApp in the workplace: Is it legally safe?

In this podcast, Lucy White and Monica Mastropasqua, members of the Data Protection team at Clarkslegal, will address frequently asked questions from clients regarding the use of WhatsApp at work.

art
  • 13 June 2025
  • Employment

Human Resources – A Shift Towards artificial intelligence?

On 6 May 2025, the SRA authorised the first law firm providing legal services through artificial intelligence. Garfield.Law will provide an AI-powered tool which can assist businesses with the small claims court process, to aid in recovering unpaid debts.

art
  • 11 June 2025
  • Employment

Employment Contracts and Specific Performance

‘Specific performance’ is a type of equitable remedy available, in some circumstances, and at the court’s discretion, for breach of contract; it entails an order by the court which legally compels a party to a contract to fulfil its contractual obligations.

art
  • 10 June 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

Taking a commercial lease: The main points to negotiate when agreeing the Heads of Terms

What are the key areas tenants may want to pay particular attention to when agreeing to the Heads of Terms (HoTs).

art
  • 09 June 2025
  • Employment

Clarkslegal representing UK employers at the International Labour Conference

I am writing this from Geneva, where I once again have the honour of attending the International Labour Organisation’s International Labour Conference.