Search

How can we help?

Icon

The British passport and Brexit

An unlikely contender to the list of key Brexit issues has been the burgundy British passport. Ardent Brexiters have advocated for the return of the ‘blue’ passport, which to their delight is set to return this year. Whilst the burgundy passports, including those which state European Union, will continue to be valid until their expiry dates, there are some key exceptions.

As a starting point, all British passports will remain valid for travel to the UK until January 2021. This means that the freedom of movement rules apply, and you are able to travel until the expiry date stated on those passports.

However, from 1 January 2021, new rules will apply. This means that you must have at least 6 months remaining on your passport (this includes both adults and children) for travel to most European countries (except Ireland – where the previous rules remain valid).

More importantly, the relevant expiry date for the passports will be 10-years from when the passport was originally issued. As such, if you renewed your passport before its expiry, and gained ‘extra months’, these extra months may not count. This could potentially cause a major issue for certain travellers as this rule does not line up the normal rules of expiry.

If you have had extra months which means you have less than 6 months from the original 10-year limit, or simply have less than 6 months left on your passport, you must renew your passport if travelling after 1 January 2021.

From 1 January 2021, new rules will apply

We expect a steep rise in passport applications for 2020 as a result of this rule, and from EU nationals who have now had settled status for more than a year.

When can I get a blue passport?

The ‘blue’ passport is expected to roll out from March 2020, but you can still expect a burgundy passport throughout 2020, as the government utilises the unused burgundy stock. Therefore, there is likely to be a mixture of both passports for this initial phase.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

Monica Atwal

Managing Partner

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 15 September 2025
  • Immigration

Sharp rise in Sponsor Licence Revocations – What employers need to know

The Home Office has reported a record number of sponsor licence revocations over the past year, as part of its intensified efforts to crack down on abuse of the UK’s immigration system.

art
  • 10 September 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

Trouble at the Table: The Challenges Facing the UK Hospitality Sector in the run up to Christmas 2025

The UK hospitality sector, long celebrated for its vibrancy and resilience, is facing a perfect storm of economic, operational, and structural challenges in 2025.

art
  • 09 September 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

Le bail commercial anglais: quelques points essentiels à considérer

Typiquement, les baux commerciaux en Angleterre sont de court terme, d’une durée de 5 ou 10 ans, avec un loyer de marché et des ajustements du loyer périodiques en fonction de l’inflation ou d’autres facteurs. 

art
  • 09 September 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

The Failure to Prevent Fraud Offence – be prepared to avoid criminal liability

The failure to prevent fraud offence is a new corporate offence which has come into force on 1 September 2025.

art
  • 08 September 2025
  • Employment

Can employers still make changes to contracts after the Employment Rights Bill?

The short answer is yes but it will be much more difficult for employers following the introduction of the Employment Rights Bill because their ability to fairly dismiss employees who do not agree contractual changes is being restricted. 

art
  • 05 September 2025
  • Privacy and Data Protection

When Ignoring a DSAR Becomes a Criminal Offence

On 3 September 2025, Mr Jason Blake appeared at Beverley Magistrates Court and was fined for failing to respond to a data subject access request (DSAR).