Search

How can we help?

Icon

Termination: the pitfalls

There are many risks in terminating a contract, particularly in construction contracts – get it wrong and you risk being in breach of contract yourself. The two main pitfalls are:

  • Not having valid ground for termination (these can be very limited), and
  • Not giving the right notices.

The Contract

The starting point is the terms of the contract which will usually set out the grounds and process for, and the effect of termination. The standard form contracts tend to have various grounds for termination, which often include:

  • Non-payment by the employer
  • Specified defaults, g. failure to proceed regularly and diligently with the works and breach of certain contract provisions
  • Specified events, e.g. force majeure
  • Insolvency

It is unusual to find a clause in domestic construction contracts that entitles an employer to terminate just because it wants to i.e. “termination for convenience”. These can sometimes appear in consultants’ appointments. However, if the motive behind termination is to get someone else to do the same work for a better price, the terminating party risks being in breach of contract.

The contract also normally describes a specific process to effect termination. The JCT form provides for a two-notice procedure.  The first is a warning notice notifying the default and giving the defaulting party an opportunity to remedy.  The second is a notice of termination.  Any notices should be given exactly in accordance with the requirements of content (i.e. set out the basis of the default) and method of delivery.

Failure to comply with such notices is likely to prevent termination being valid. The contract may also impose limits on the right to termination i.e. that it should be reasonable or in good faith. For example, the JCT form says that a notice to terminate should not be given “unreasonably or vexatiously”.  This is normally a basis of challenge by the party that has been terminated.

Common Law Termination (non-contractual)

Unless the contract expressly excludes it, there is also a separate right at common law to terminate if there is a fundamental breach of contract.  This is called repudiation. However, establishing repudiation is not straightforward and it depends on the nature of the breach. It may also depend on what the contract says. It must be enough to demonstrate that one party no longer intends to be bound by the contract. The terminating party (here the “innocent party”) must demonstrate the breach justified termination. In this situation, it takes two to end the contract and the innocent party can choose whether to ignore the breach or accept it and bring the contract to an end and claim damages.

Do you have to choose between contract and repudiation?

This is a complex area and in certain circumstances, you can try to enforce both.  You should consider your position carefully before exercising your right to terminate and assess the risks of choosing one option over the other or trying to pursue both.

Also, if you try to serve notice of termination under the contract and you get it wrong, you risk being in repudiation yourself. This will entitle the other party to accept the repudiation (i.e. bring the contract to an end) and claim damages.

The consequences of termination

The contract will usually set out the consequences of termination and its effect on payment.

This was relevant in the recent case of Almacantar (Centre Point) Ltd v Sir Robert McAlpine Ltd (2018) which related to works carried out under a pre-construction services agreement at the Centre Point tower in London.  The contractor had completed all its services but the parties decided not to proceed to the second stage and the contract was terminated by mutual agreement.  There was a subsequent argument about the contractor’s entitlement to 50% of its fee which the agreement stated was payable if the parties entered into a construction contract.   The court held that the contractor was not entitled to this because the clauses dealing with payment on termination did not provide for it.  In this case the contractor should have ensured that all material terms of the termination (including payments) should have been agreed and recorded in the agreement to terminate.

The starting point is the terms of the contract which will usually set out the grounds and process for, and the effect of termination.

Points to consider

As termination is a risky business here are some points to consider: 

  • Does the contract have to end? Consider whether you can manage and/or take steps to improve the relationship. Often early advice in this regard can help save time and money later.
  • Check the contract and comply with the terms. Again, obtaining early advice can ensure money isn’t wasted in dealing with problems later in the process.
  • Can you hedge your bets? i.e. exercise contractual right to termination and elect to accept repudiation?
  • Draft any notices carefully: State the grounds and refer to the contractual
  • provision and/or repudiation and ensure that you check the method of delivery.
  • If you are the party being terminated, check that it is on valid grounds, contractual requirements have been complied with and whether you can object (i.e. has the other party acted unreasonably?).

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 29 July 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

Right to Renew: The Law Commission’s Statement

Many commercial tenants occupy their premises under tenancies. Part 2 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (the “Act”) gives these business tenants the right to remain in their premises when their tenancies would have otherwise come to an end, this is known as a “right to renew” or “security of tenure”.

art
  • 29 July 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

Articles of Association v. Shareholders Agreement in England and Wales: Which one works best for you and your company?

The decision of whether to solely rely on a company’s Articles of Association or implement a bespoke Shareholders’ Agreement depends on the specific needs and priorities of the individual shareholders and the company alike.

Pub
  • 28 July 2025
  • Employment

Talking Employment Law: The Employment Rights Bill – Part 3

In part three of the Employment Rights Bill podcast series, Louise Keenan and Lucy White, members of the employment team, will discuss changes to fire and re-hire practices, harassment, zero-hour contracts and tribunal limitation periods.

art
  • 24 July 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

Deal Announcement: Clarkslegal’s corporate lawyers advise on the sale of Just Construction Recruitment Ltd to ASAP TT SAS

Clarkslegal’s corporate team is pleased to have advised the shareholders of Just Construction Recruitment Ltd on the sale of the company to French based, ASAP TT SAS.

art
  • 23 July 2025
  • Immigration

Home Office Announces Major Changes to Skilled Worker Route

On 1 July 2025, the Home Office released a new Statement of Changes (HC 997), delivering on the first phase of what the government calls a “sweeping reform” to the immigration system, as set out in the May 2025 Immigration White Paper. The changes to the Immigration Rules were enforced on 22 July 2025.

art
  • 21 July 2025
  • Employment

When the ‘Kiss Cam’ Captures More Than Just a Moment: Romantic Relationships in the Workplace and the Legal Risks

Imagine this: A packed Coldplay concert. Tens of thousands of fans. Suddenly, the “kiss cam” camera pans to the crowd and lands on a man and woman sharing an affectionate embrace.