Search

How can we help?

Icon

Tenant wins challenge against Landlord’s ‘conclusive’ service charge statement

In the recent case of  Sara & Hossein Asset Holdings Ltd v Blacks Outdoor Retail Ltd [2020] EWHC 1263 (Ch), the High Court held that a tenant could challenge the service charge sums due under their lease, despite a clause in their lease stating that the landlord’s service charge certificate was ‘conclusive’ save for absent manifest or mathematical error or fraud.

Blacks Outdoor Retail Ltd (Blacks) was the tenant of commercial premises at Chicago Buildings, Whitechapel and Stanley Street.  Their landlord – Sara & Hossein Asset Holdings Ltd (S&HAH Ltd) instigated proceedings against them for non-payment of service charge over the previous two years.  The service charge amounted to £55,000 in the first year and £400,000 in the second year.  S&HAH Ltd asserted that they had produced a certificate in respect of such sums and that in accordance with the terms of the lease, such certificate was ‘conclusive’.  However, Blacks argued that the costs S&HAH Ltd were seeking to recover were in respect of modernisation and improvement works and as such were not recoverable as service charge, as they did not fall within the landlord’s repairing obligations under the lease.

The High Court found in favour of Blacks and held that, the service charge certificate was conclusive as to the amount of the service charge, but was not conclusive as to whether those costs actually fell within the scope of the service charge payable by the tenant under the lease.  Accordingly the tenant was entitled to challenge the service charge costs.

Landlords should carefully consider whether the sums they are seeking to recover actually fall within the service charge provisions of their lease

While this case turned on the specific wording of Black’s lease, it nonetheless provides a useful reminder that a clause purporting that a service charge certificate is ‘conclusive’ will not be conclusive where those sums were never properly due.  Landlords should carefully consider whether the sums they are seeking to recover actually fall within the service charge provisions of their lease, particularly in respect of improvement and modernisation works.  Similarly, tenants should scrutinise any certificates/demands for payment so that they only pay what is due under their lease.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 15 September 2025
  • Immigration

Sharp rise in Sponsor Licence Revocations – What employers need to know

The Home Office has reported a record number of sponsor licence revocations over the past year, as part of its intensified efforts to crack down on abuse of the UK’s immigration system.

art
  • 10 September 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

Trouble at the Table: The Challenges Facing the UK Hospitality Sector in the run up to Christmas 2025

The UK hospitality sector, long celebrated for its vibrancy and resilience, is facing a perfect storm of economic, operational, and structural challenges in 2025.

art
  • 09 September 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

Le bail commercial anglais: quelques points essentiels à considérer

Typiquement, les baux commerciaux en Angleterre sont de court terme, d’une durée de 5 ou 10 ans, avec un loyer de marché et des ajustements du loyer périodiques en fonction de l’inflation ou d’autres facteurs. 

art
  • 09 September 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

The Failure to Prevent Fraud Offence – be prepared to avoid criminal liability

The failure to prevent fraud offence is a new corporate offence which has come into force on 1 September 2025.

art
  • 08 September 2025
  • Employment

Can employers still make changes to contracts after the Employment Rights Bill?

The short answer is yes but it will be much more difficult for employers following the introduction of the Employment Rights Bill because their ability to fairly dismiss employees who do not agree contractual changes is being restricted. 

art
  • 05 September 2025
  • Privacy and Data Protection

When Ignoring a DSAR Becomes a Criminal Offence

On 3 September 2025, Mr Jason Blake appeared at Beverley Magistrates Court and was fined for failing to respond to a data subject access request (DSAR).