How can we help?


Take care when providing replies to pre-contract enquiries

When selling a property, a standard procedure is for the seller to provide replies to enquiries raised by the Buyer and its solicitors.  The standard form of enquiries that is often used for commercial transactions (“CPSEs”) specifically states that the Seller acknowledges that it is obliged to provide the Buyer with copies of all relevant documentation whether or not the specifically requested to do so and that prior to exchange of contracts, it will notify the Buyer on becoming aware of anything which may cause any reply that it has given to any enquiry to be incorrect.

In the recent case of Greenridge Luton One Limited v Kempton Investments Limited [2016] EWHC 91 (Ch) the Buyer was awarded not only the return of its deposit but damages for deceit of almost £400,000.

In this case the Seller owned a property consisting of three office buildings, most of which was leased to a travel company (the Tenant).  The lease provided for payment of a service charge and the Tenant disputed the service charge and withheld payments.

At that time the Seller was trying to sell the freehold property and the consultant acting for the Seller told the Seller that he thought that the Tenant was trying to adversely affect the sale.

In anticipation of a purchaser being found, the consultant had prepared draft replies to CPSEs and had forwarded these to a director of the Seller.  The replies, which were sent to prospective buyers, said that there were no outstanding disputes or arrears, no disputes relating to the service charge, no unresolved disputes or breaches of covenant and only stated that the Tenant had made “further enquiries”.  The Buyer asked for further information, but none was provided.

The Buyer and the Seller exchanged contracts and the Buyer paid a deposit.

The contract specifically stated that the Seller would sell the property free from encumbrances, that full disclosure had been given of any encumbrance, that a buyer would be entitled to rescind the contract where an error or omission resulted from fraud or recklessness and required provision of accounts of outstanding service charges.

The Buyer became aware of the service charge arrears and repudiated the contract in accordance with the contract terms.  The Seller retained the deposit.  The Buyer claimed the return of the deposit and damages arising from the fraudulent misrepresentation of the Seller.  The matter went to the High Court and the judge determined that the Seller had either fraudulently misrepresented the situation or had been reckless as to whether the information provided was correct and therefore the Buyer was entitled to the return of the deposit and an award for deceit.

Chambers and Partners

The Clarkslegal team are commercial and good to work with. They get what our business needs and tell me what I need to hear.

It is important for sellers and their advisers to ensure that:

  • replies to enquiries are compiled with all necessary care and attention so that information which should be disclosed is disclosed and is not concealed or inadvertently omitted;
  • up to date replies to enquiries are provided to the buyer and the seller keeps the buyer informed of any change in circumstances that will affect the accuracy of the replies.  This is especially important where a sale becomes protracted or replies to standard enquiries prepared for an earlier buyer are issued to an alternative buyer at a later date;
  • Sellers should always respond to any request for clarification of replies provided or further supporting documentation to provide evidence of the information provided.

If you would like any assistance in connection with the sale and purchase of a property or have any query relating to an issue arising from pre-contract enquiries please contact our Commercial Property Team.

About this article


This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

  • 16 May 2024
  • Immigration

What Employers need to know about Biometric Residence Permits

Biometric Residence Permits (BRPs) are biometric immigration documents that are issued to non-EEA nationals and EEA nationals, who have been granted permission to stay in the UK.

  • 14 May 2024

Clarkslegal’s London team moves to new Chancery Lane office

The London office of Clarkslegal has relocated to Chancery House, on Chancery Lane. The staff is enthusiastic about the relocation because Chancery Lane has a longstanding association with the legal profession in London.

  • 10 May 2024
  • Employment

New duty on employers to prevent sexual harassment – coming October 2024

The Worker Protection (Amendment of Equality Act 2010) Act 2023 is due to come into force in October 2024.

  • 09 May 2024
  • Employment

Labour Party Employment Law Proposals – Promises of further consultations and a softer approach

The Prime Minister recently announced a raft of changes, to be implemented in the next parliament, aimed at reducing the number of people who are economically inactive due to illness.

  • 09 May 2024
  • Corporate and M&A

Navigating corporate transparency: ECCTA reforms series – part 1

The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA) received Royal Assent in October 2023 and marked a pivotal moment in corporate governance and transparency.

  • 07 May 2024
  • Employment

Changes to TUPE rules from 1 July 2024

The Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (‘TUPE’) aim to safeguard employees’ rights on the transfer of a business or on the change of a service.