- 25 October 2022
In April to June 2021, three in four mothers with dependent children were in work in the UK. This was the highest level reached in the equivalent quarter over 20 years. During the same period, 92.1% of fathers were employed. Parents – particularly mothers – have become a popular group of employees, and it is time for employers to consider how to deal with this workforce.
Maternity and Paternity Leave
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has confirmed that the Australian government would boost paid parental leave from 18 to 26 weeks.
This has started a conversation about how people deal with childcare responsibilities when they have work. In particular, the discrepancy between working mothers and working fathers when it comes to time off work to care for a new born.
In the UK, working mothers are entitled to 52 weeks’ Maternity Leave, provided they meet certain eligibility requirements. Statutory Maternity Pay is paid for up to 39 weeks of that time. For six weeks, mothers receive 90% of their average weekly earnings before tax, and for the next 39 weeks, mothers receive either 90% of their average weekly earnings or £156.66 a week, whichever is lower. It is up to each employer whether or not they wish to pay their employee for the remainder of the Maternity Leave.
Fathers on the other hand are only entitled to one or two weeks’ paid Paternity Leave, the rate being £156.66 a week or 90% of the employee’s average weekly earnings, whichever is lower.
There is a lot of controversy surrounding the law in this area, with multiple conflicting views. Many believe that two weeks of Paternity Leave is nowhere near enough time for fathers to bond with their babies. It also means that mothers are left to bear the burden of being the main child carer. Mothers being away from work for longer is also one of the reasons that contribute to the gender pay gap.
Shared Parental Leave
Since the introduction of Shared Parental Leave (SPL) in 2015, the law has given working parents the chance to be on potentially equal footing regarding new born babies. In the first year after a child is born or adopted, parents can share up to 50 weeks of leave and up to 37 weeks of pay between them, provided they are eligible to do so.
SPL sounds like a popular route, even for parents who may not necessarily wish to take part. It offers fathers the option to spend more time with their child, and mothers the option to go back to work sooner but not compromise on the aspect of a child having a parent heavily involved in the first year of their life.
However, organisations such as Maternity Action, the Fawcett Society, and the National Childbirth Trust have called for SPL to be re-evaluated because they view it as an unfair system. This is backed by Maternity Action’s findings that take-up among eligible couples is only between 3% and 4%. The organisations have the view that parental leave should be on a ‘take it or lose it’ basis, rather than on a shared basis.
Parents – particularly mothers – have become a popular group of employees, and it is time for employers to consider how to deal with this workforce.
What employers offer
There are employers who are known to have ‘good’ parental leave policies. Etsy, for example, offers a gender blind approach to parental leave. All of Etsy’s employees have the option of taking 26 weeks of fully paid leave in the first year of their child’s life.
Being a parent-friendly employer arguably goes beyond offering parents time off during the first year of their child’s life. Employers could offer flexible working arrangements that allow parents to be more involved in their children’s upbringing. With changing social attitudes, especially as a result of the pandemic, many people now expect to have a more work-life balance. Working remotely or hybrid working have become more of a norm, and have certainly been seen as favourable by many groups. The majority of working parents want to maintain homeworking and hybrid working practices. This is no surprise as working from home cuts down on commuting time, and allows people to get things done during their lunch hour. All of this means more time could be spent on family, rather than on work.
Atkins, a multinational building consultancy, is considered to be a parent-friendly employer, as it offers a range of benefits including job sharing, part-time working, mobile working and working at home. Staff can also buy up to 15 days additional holiday. Atkins also has Return-To-Work bonuses that encourage working parents to go back to work.
Flexible working requests
The statutory scheme to request flexible working is limited to employees with at least 26 weeks’ continuous service, however, there is nothing to stop any member of staff asking their employer to vary their working pattern, regardless of their length of service or employment status. Employers need to be aware that they may be on the receiving end of an indirect discrimination claim if they reject an employee’s request for flexible working. As an example, if an employee wishes to vary her hours due to her childcare arrangements and her request is denied, she may be able to bring an indirect sex discrimination claim.
Although such claims are often brought by women, it is possible for men to claim discrimination if their employer rejects their request to work part-time due to having childcare responsibilities. This would be the case only if that same employer allowed female employees to work part-time in order to care for their children.
Key takeaways for employers
- A workforce that is happy with its work-life balance is more likely to want to remain with its employer. This is a benefit that employers may find worth the sacrifice of offering better parental leave policies, seeing as staff retention has become a growing concern for many.
- Encouraging SPL could help women go back to work sooner and combat the gender pay gap.
- Offering flexible working arrangements for one group of parents over another may open up doors to discrimination claims.
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.
About this article
SubjectSupporting parents at work
Published25 October 2022
Read, listen and watch our latest insights
- 06 February 2023
Redundancy and settlement agreements – What you need to know
In this podcast Ciara Duggan and Sana Nahas members of the employment team at Clarkslegal will guide you through the tricky topic of redundancy and settlement agreements, covering what redundancy means for both employers and employees, as well as how settlement agreements work in practise.
- 30 January 2023
Deborah Scales comments on ‘the proposed Mental Health First Aid Bill’
In People Management, Deborah Scales, Associate at Clarkslegal, discusses the reasons why people professionals would likely welcome a change in set law as a “relatively swift and cost-effective” way to help the workplace.
- 25 January 2023
Government’s response to menopause recommendations in the workplace
The UK Government has recently rejected calls for the menopause to be made a ‘protected characteristic’ and for a large-scale pilot of menopause leave.
- 24 January 2023
Melanie Pimenta comments on ‘positive action’ and what it means for employers
In Personnel Today, Melanie Pimenta, Senior Solicitor at Clarkslegal, discusses ‘positive action’ and what it means for employers.
- 20 January 2023
Deborah Scales comments on employee who handed keys in and said ‘I’m done’ did not resign and was unfairly dismissed
In People Management magazine, Deborah Scales, Associate at Clarkslegal LLP, comments on a recent tribunal ruling in which a factory supervisor who handed in her keys in an “anxious state” and said “I’m done” did not resign and was unfairly dismissed.
- 13 January 2023
Key employment cases to look out for in 2023
Last year we witnessed various cases and important decisions affecting the employment legal landscape, including, Rodgers v Leeds Laser Cutting Limited (the first COVID-19-related unfair dismissal case to go to the Court of Appeal); Harpur Trust v Brazel (the Supreme Court case relating to holiday pay for part-time workers); and Tesco Stores Limited v USDAW and Ors (relating to firing and rehiring practices), to name a few.