Search

How can we help?

Icon

‘Stale’ equalities training no defence to race claim

The case of Allay (UK) Ltd v Gehlen, is stark warning to employers not to rely on ‘stale’ or ‘ineffective’ equalities (equal opportunities and anti-harassment) training as a defence to claims of unlawful discrimination. In its recently published judgmentthe Employment Appeal Tribunal went even further stating that it would expect colleagues, and especially managers, to report an act of discrimination and harassment to HR or managementrather than ignoring it or telling the victim to report it them themselves. 

The law – ‘the reasonable steps’ defence  

Under the Equality Act 2010, S.109, when a worker commits an act of unlawful discrimination in the course of their employment, their employer is treated as having committed the act itself. An employer haa statutory defence to discrimination and harassment claims if it can prove that it has taken ‘all reasonable steps’ to prevent the unlawful conduct happening in the first place.  

The case of Allay (UK) Ltd v Gehlen 

Mr Gehlen described himself as being ‘of Indian origin’ and complained that he had been subjected to harassment related to his race by a colleague, Mr PeacockUnder investigation Mr Peacock admitted to engaging in what he called “racial banter” with comments such as go and work in a corner shop.   

When Mr Gehlen brought claims against Allay including a claim of harassmentAllay sought to rely on the ‘reasonable steps’ defence under S.109(4). The tribunal rejected Allay’s defence and upheld Mr Gehlen’s claim for harassmentThe tribunal noted that while Allay had given equality and diversity training, included harassment related to race to its workforce 2 years earlier that training was clearly ‘stale’ and ineffective 

The tribunal concluded that the training was stale not just because Mr Peacock hamade the comments but because three colleagues had failed to properly react to the harassment. A reasonable step for Allay to have taken would therefore have been to provide refresher training.   

 In its recently published judgmentthe Employment Appeal Tribunal went even further stating that it would expect colleagues, and especially managers, to report an act of discrimination and harassment to HR or managementrather than ignoring it or telling the victim to report it them themselves. 

What equalities lessons for employers? 

In its judgment the EAT warns that in considering the reasonableness of the steps an employer has taken, it is not enough to ask whether there has been training but also the nature of the training and how likely is to be effective.  

Here is an extract from the EAT judgement that sums it up: “If training involved no more than gathering employees together and saying, “here is your harassment training, don’t harass people, now everyone back to work”, it is unlikely to be effective, or to last  

Our advice is that if it becomes clear that despite training staff are continuing to engage in harassment, or do not understand the important of preventing it and reporting it to managers, employers should take this a clear signal that more effective training is urgently needed 

Finally bear in mind that this warning does not just apply to acts of racial harassment but to also to discrimination and harassment related to other protected characteristics under the Equality Act. 

For further advice equalities and diversity training, or on any other employment law or discrimination issue contact our employment team.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 31 October 2024
  • Employment

Potential impact of the Employment Rights Bill – Amanda Glover and Jesse Akiwumi write for Employee Benefits

Amanda Glover and Jesse Akiwumi write for Employee Benefits about the Employment Rights Bill, which addresses exploitative zero-hour contracts and allows workers to opt for guaranteed hours.

art
  • 29 October 2024
  • Privacy and Data Protection

The ICO’s 2024-2025 priorities for protecting children’s personal information online

The Information Commissioner Officer (the “ICO”) has set out its 2024-2025 priorities for protecting children’s personal information online.

Pub
  • 25 October 2024
  • Employment

TUPE Podcast Series: Changing Terms and Conditions

In this seventh episode of our TUPE Podcast Series, Louise Keenan will discuss the restrictions on changing terms and conditions for employees who are transferring. 

art
  • 25 October 2024
  • Employment

Changing Attitudes to Menopause

We have set out some answers to the frequently asked questions that employers ask when considering how to support a menopausal employee.

art
  • 25 October 2024
  • Employment

Court rules that ignoring employee’s greeting contributed to a breach of trust and confidence

In a recent ruling, an Employment Tribunal held that an employer had contributed to the breakdown of the trust and confidence with their employee by failing to respond to the employee’s greeting.

art
  • 21 October 2024
  • Commercial Real Estate

Commercial Property Standard Enquiries (CPSE): why is it important to get them right?

Commercial Property Standard Enquiries (CPSE) have been a part of a commercial property transaction for over two decades now. Nonetheless, it would be safe to say they can be tricky to deal with.