Search

How can we help?

Icon

Spouse Visa – What sources of income are not permitted?

Previously we have focused on the sources of income which can be counted towards the financial requirement, but in this blog we will shed some light on the sources of income which are not counted towards the financial requirement.

Third party support

Unfortunately, some applications are refused on the basis that financial support from third parties are not counted towards the financial requirement. Only the following third party or subsidy financial support can be counted:

  • Child maintenance or alimony payments from a former partner
  • Academic maintenance grants/stipends
  • Gift of cash savings (see below)

Gift of cash savings

Gifts of cash savings will only be permissible if the source of the cash savings is declared and evidenced. The cash savings must have been held by the applicant, their partner or jointly for at least 6 months prior to the date of application and are under their control.

What sources of income are not permitted?

Other income not included:

  • Income from others who live in the same household unless it is income from a dependant child who has turned 18 and remains in the same household as the applicant and continues to be counted towards the financial requirement
  • Loans and credit facilities
  • Income-related benefits:
    • Income support
    • Income-related employment and support allowance (ESA)
    • Pensions credit
    • Housing benefit
    • Council tax benefit or support
    • Income-based jobseeker’s allowance
  • Contributory benefits:
    • Contribution-based jobseeker’s allowance
    • Contribution-based employment and support allowance
    • Incapacity benefit
  • Child benefit
  • Working tax credit
  • Child tax credit
  • Universal credit
  • Unemployability allowance, allowance for a lowered standard of occupation and invalidity allowance under the war pensions scheme
  • Any other source of income not specified under the immigration rules as counting towards the financial requirement

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

Monica Atwal

Managing Partner

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 09 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

The Arbitration Act 2025 – Factsheet

This factsheet outlines the major reforms and key developments introduced by the Arbitration Act 2025, including updates on summary disposal, jurisdictional challenges, emergency arbitrators, arbitrator disclosure duties, and governing law in arbitration proceedings.

art
  • 09 July 2026
  • Immigration

Right to Work Checks are changing from 1 October 2026: Is your business ready?

The Home Office’s new rules, effective 1 October 2026, will overhaul right to work checks and raise the risk of civil penalties for UK businesses.

art
  • 08 July 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

ICO prosecutes employee under the Data Protection Act for forwarding client data to his personal email address

The issue of employees taking confidential business information or personal data when moving to a new employer remains a significant concern for businesses.

Pub
  • 07 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Accelerating arbitration: Expedited procedures and key changes in the new ICC Rules – Episode 2

In episode 2, Jack Hobbs (Clarkslegal) and Christopher Howitt (Three Stone) explore how the latest expedited and highly expedited procedures under the ICC Arbitration Rules 2026 are transforming the landscape of dispute resolution.

art
  • 07 July 2026
  • Employment

6 month unfair dismissal rights: What employers need to know

Under the new Employment Rights Act 2025 the minimum period of service required to qualify to bring a statutory claim for unfair dismissal has been reduced from 2 full years to 6 months from 1 January 2027 onwards.  

art
  • 02 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Litigation and Artificial Intelligence: Where are we now?

In the recent case of Cork and another v Smith, the High Court publicly admonished a law firm and two of its solicitors after they had produced and submitted two AI-generated letters to the court containing misleading and false information in relation to a block transfer application made under Rule 12.37 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016.