Search

How can we help?

Icon

Spouse Visa – Is your relationship genuine and subsisting?

For years many couples have become frustrated by the requirements for a spouse visa as the rules and guidance are difficult to understand. A significant amount of applications are rejected on the basis of the applicant not providing the adequate documents to evidence the relationship requirement. The Home Office guidance states, “an applicant and their partner must provide evidence that they are in a genuine and subsisting relationship” But what does this mean?

Relationship Requirement

The guidance is unclear on what documents are suitable to evidence this requirement, apart from confirming that the marriage or civil partnership certificate is mandatory. Unfortunately, it is not enough to simply provide the Home Office with a marriage or civil partnership certificate to evidence the relationship. Thus, it is not surprising that applicants fail to understand the number of documents they need to submit as evidence of their relationship.

There are certain situations where it may be difficult to prove that a couple are in a genuine and subsisting relationship due to cultural or religious differences or practices. For example, in certain cultures it is unacceptable to cohabit prior to marriage or because the marriage was arranged, there was no opportunity to cohabit. Consequently, the applicant and the sponsor would not have cohabited at all or even have known each other for a long period of time, but this does not necessarily undermine the genuineness of their relationship. The Home Office in their recent guidance/policy has accepted that cohabitation is not a requirement to show the couple are in a durable relationship. It is essential to demonstrate that the relationship is similar to a marriage at the time of the application.  Intention is a crucial element to show when applying for an application under Appendix FM of the Immigration Rules.

Acceptable evidence

There are a number of documents a couple can provide to evidence their relationship; examples include:

  • Photographs of applicant and sponsor at their wedding/civil partnership or on holidays
  • Wedding/civil partnership invitation card
  • Flight and hotel bookings with names of both the applicant and the sponsor
  • Statements from friends and family to evidence relationship is genuine and subsisting
  • Evidence of communication between applicant and sponsor such as emails, calls logs, and messages
  • Evidence of cohabiting such as tenancy agreements (where applicable)
  • Evidence that the Applicant and the Sponsor have visited each other’s home countries

A significant amount of applications are rejected on the basis of the applicant not providing the adequate documents to evidence the relationship requirement

A significant amount of applications are rejected on the basis of the applicant not providing the adequate documents to evidence the relationship requirement.

To conclude, it is highlighted that a marriage or civil partnership certificate is not sufficient on its own to prove that a relationship in genuine and subsisting. This may seem unusual, but routinely the Home Office have to distinguish between sham marriages and genuine relationships, especially with the increase in the number of sham marriages. Although a genuine couple who have entered into a marriage or civil partnership for the convenience of immigration will not be seen as a sham. It is strongly advised to seek legal advice before submitting an application to avoid a rejection.

 

Check out our most recent Spouse Visa Guide 2026 

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

Monica Mastropasqua

Solicitor

View profile

+44 20 7539 8021

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 02 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Litigation and Artificial Intelligence: Where are we now?

In the recent case of Cork and another v Smith, the High Court publicly admonished a law firm and two of its solicitors after they had produced and submitted two AI-generated letters to the court containing misleading and false information in relation to a block transfer application made under Rule 12.37 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016.

Pub
  • 30 June 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Overview of the new ICC Arbitration Rules: Key changes – Episode 1

In this episode, Jack Hobbs (Clarkslegal) and Christopher Howitt (Three Stone) discuss the major updates in the ICC Arbitration Rules 2026 and what they mean for practitioners, clients, and the future of international arbitration.

art
  • 26 June 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Exit Readiness Consultation: Prepare your business for a successful sale

Take the first step toward a smoother, more profitable business exit. Our Exit Readiness service provides tailored health checks, expert guidance, and a free initial consultation—helping you address potential issues early and maximise your sale value.

art
  • 25 June 2026
  • Immigration

Justice and Home Affairs Committee – Settlement, Citizenship and Integration: What the House of Lords Report Means for Migrants

Discover how the House of Lords report influences UK settlement, citizenship, and integration policies. Learn what it means for migrants and employers.

art
  • 24 June 2026
  • Employment

What are employer’s obligations during a heatwave?

During the summer, employers can come across employee issues relating to the heat and hot weather. How can employers handle hot weather and what are employer obligations during a heatwave?

art
  • 23 June 2026
  • Employment

Pride month and employment law: Ensuring compliance with LGBTQ+ protections

With each Pride month, companies unveil rainbow logos and send office wide emails of solidarity. These gestures are valuable, giving visible demonstrations of support, but only really make a difference if those companies are able to truly say that their policies and practices are inclusive and legally compliant.