How can we help?


Sky Engineer Not Following Safety Procedure Was Discriminated Against

The Claimant was a Field Engineer who was suspended for breaching his employer’s Health and Safety policy by failing to take safety precautions. 

The Claimant stated that the reason for not following policy was that his mind was elsewhere due to an imminent divorce and possibility of custody issues over his daughter. During his suspension the Claimant underwent an Occupational Health review where it was confirmed that he had been experiencing symptoms of ‘reactive depression’.

The Claimant claimed he had told his manager previously about the issues in his home life but had not requested an Occupational Health referral before the incident because he wanted to “keep it to [himself]”. The Claimant had not had any previous disciplinary issues over his 11 years of service and confirmed that his mental health had not affected his work before this incident.

The Claimant was subsequently dismissed for gross misconduct and the employer sought to rely on a number of factors including the following:

–       That the claimant had failed to seek support from the company;

–       He had worked safely on other site-visits that day; and

–       The Claimant’s personal circumstances had been an issue long before the incident in question.

The Tribunal disagreed with the approach taken by Sky-In-Home, instead finding that the Claimant’s depression was a disability and that his dismissal was a clear example of unfavourable treatment arising from a disability.  On the matter of whether such treatment could be objectively justified, the Tribunal accepted that protecting health and safety was a legitimate aim but concluded that “…the disadvantage suffered by the claimant in losing his job outweighed the reasonable needs of the respondent’s business”.

Jacob Montague


View profile

+44 118 960 4613

The Claimant was subsequently dismissed for gross misconduct.

This is an interesting case for employers to take notice of.  It highlights that whilst employers may find it easy to demonstrate a legitimate aim when health and safety is concerned it must act proportionately.  Here, the link between the Claimant’s health and actions was not given proper consideration and it was particularly relevant that the Claimant had expressed his regret over the incident and took responsibility for what had happened, suggesting that he could have been reintegrated into the business with a warning.

For the full judgement click here.

About this article

This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Jacob Montague


View profile

+44 118 960 4613

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

  • 22 September 2023
  • Employment

Talking Employment Law: New family friendly rights

In this first podcast in the ‘Talking Employment Law’ series, Lucy Densham Brown and Rebecca Dowle, members of the employment team summarise some of the big new family-friendly Bills that are working their way through parliament.

  • 20 September 2023
  • Commercial Real Estate

Commercial buyers beware of residential Stamp Duty Land Tax

This article discusses a recent case in which a property buyer calculated the Stamp Duty Land Tax due on the purchase at a lower rate, due to the mixed-use purpose of the property.

  • 19 September 2023
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Organisations’ use of social media: Data protection

Social media applications (or commonly known as ‘apps’) are being developed all the time and we are constantly being introduced to new social media platforms, some of which take almost no time to gain huge popularity.

  • 14 September 2023
  • Immigration

Entrepreneurial Dreams: What is the Innovator Founder Visa?

In an era defined by innovation and entrepreneurship, the United Kingdom has made a substantial effort towards fostering its reputation as a global hub for start-ups and innovators. The introduction of the UK’s ‘Innovator Founder’ route has marked a pivotal moment in the country’s immigration policy.

  • 11 September 2023
  • Corporate and M&A

Changes to the tax treatment of Employee Ownership Trusts

The government published a consultation on 18 July 2023 seeking the public’s views on its proposals to reform the tax treatment of Employee Ownership Trusts and Employee Benefit Trusts. Parties are invited to express their opinions via email via the government website until the consultation closes on 25 September 2023.

  • 08 September 2023
  • Immigration

Navigating the Latest Immigration Rules for Overstayers in the UK: A Comprehensive Guide for 2023

Staying beyond the expiration of your UK visa is a serious matter that, in most cases, can result in significant and long-lasting repercussions.