Search

How can we help?

Icon

Settlement offers and redundancies: the cost of getting it wrong

Responsible employers are mindful of the impact redundancy has on individuals. They are also rightly concerned about the negative effects of redundancy consultation programmes on the morale of all employees involved, including those who remain with the business at the end.

Some of these negatives can be mitigated by making settlement offers which are more generous than statutory redundancy terms. Many businesses view settlement offers as a way to cut short usual redundancy timeframes in order to preserve resources for those jobs which remain viable.

However, it is crucial that, before making any such offers, employers understand the potential legal risks of not carrying out fair and lawful consultation.

This applies particularly where:

  • there are 20 or more redundancies in prospect at one establishment;
  • there is a reduction in headcount but not a complete workplace closure; or
  • headcount in a particular role is being reduced but not to zero.

Responsible employers are mindful of the impact redundancy has on individuals.

Miscalculations by employers in any of these situations can lead to the need to substantially increase settlement offers in order to avoid employment tribunal claims.

Most employees will be well aware of the economic strain on businesses but in such a tough job market it is natural for them to fight for the best possible exit package and businesses should plan accordingly.

Understanding the legal risks and correctly judging the level of settlement offer is matched in importance by getting the communications right. The happier the employees are with the way the business conducts itself in difficult times, the less likely they are to make claims.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 15 September 2025
  • Immigration

Sharp rise in Sponsor Licence Revocations – What employers need to know

The Home Office has reported a record number of sponsor licence revocations over the past year, as part of its intensified efforts to crack down on abuse of the UK’s immigration system.

art
  • 10 September 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

Trouble at the Table: The Challenges Facing the UK Hospitality Sector in the run up to Christmas 2025

The UK hospitality sector, long celebrated for its vibrancy and resilience, is facing a perfect storm of economic, operational, and structural challenges in 2025.

art
  • 09 September 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

Le bail commercial anglais: quelques points essentiels à considérer

Typiquement, les baux commerciaux en Angleterre sont de court terme, d’une durée de 5 ou 10 ans, avec un loyer de marché et des ajustements du loyer périodiques en fonction de l’inflation ou d’autres facteurs. 

art
  • 09 September 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

The Failure to Prevent Fraud Offence – be prepared to avoid criminal liability

The failure to prevent fraud offence is a new corporate offence which has come into force on 1 September 2025.

art
  • 08 September 2025
  • Employment

Can employers still make changes to contracts after the Employment Rights Bill?

The short answer is yes but it will be much more difficult for employers following the introduction of the Employment Rights Bill because their ability to fairly dismiss employees who do not agree contractual changes is being restricted. 

art
  • 05 September 2025
  • Privacy and Data Protection

When Ignoring a DSAR Becomes a Criminal Offence

On 3 September 2025, Mr Jason Blake appeared at Beverley Magistrates Court and was fined for failing to respond to a data subject access request (DSAR).