Search

How can we help?

Icon

Restrictive covenants – employers watch out

Employers can be liable for inducing a breach of a restrictive covenant, but relying on legal advice can provide a defence as held the Court of Appeal in Allen v Dodd & Co Ltd.

Prior to employing Mr Pollock, Dodd and Co sought legal advice on his current employment contract with David Allen Chartered Accountants (‘Allen’), in particular his post-termination restrictions. The legal advice was that it was “more probable than not” that the restrictions would be unenforceable. Relying on this advice, Dodd and Co hired Mr Pollock.

Allen subsequently sought to enforce the post-termination restrictions in the High Court, which, after severing some words, held that the restrictions were enforceable against Mr Pollock. As part of their deliberations, the High Court considered whether Dodd and Co were liable for inducing the breach by Mr Pollock. It was held that they were not liable as “they did not turn a blind eye to the employee’s contractual obligations”. This was evidenced by the fact they had obtained legal advice.

Employers can be liable for inducing a breach of a restrictive covenant.

On appeal, Allen’s case was dismissed again. The Court of Appeal held that where “the defendant honestly believes that the act that he procures will not amount to a breach of contract, he is not liable”.  As Dodd and Co had relied honestly on their legal advice and that the advice did not definitively conclude that there would be a breach, they were not liable.

This is a very useful reminder that employers can be liable for inducing a breach of contract. Employers should take legal advice as early as possible in order to understand the risks of that accompany post-termination restrictions; this will help therefore mitigate any risk of inducement.

For more information on restrictive covenants, get in touch with our Employment department.

subscribe to our mailing list

About this article

  • Subject
    Restrictive covenants – employers watch out
  • Author
  • Expertise
    Employment
  • Published
    26 November 2020

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

  • Subject
    Restrictive covenants – employers watch out
  • Author
  • Expertise
    Employment
  • Published
    26 November 2020

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 13 March 2018
  • Commercial Real Estate

Beware all landowners! Be careful not to inadvertently grant a public right of way over your land.

The very real risk of an owner of land allowing rights of access over their land and then these leading to a dedicated public right of way was recently highlighted in the case of R v Cumbria County Council and Peter Lamb EWHC 2651. It is therefore worth considering how the local authorities assess whether a public right of way has been established, to hopefully prevent landowners from suffering from this potential incumbrance on their land.
art
  • 13 March 2018
  • Commercial Real Estate

Novation and Assignment: Sisters, Not Twins

There’s often, understandably, a bit of uncertainty about whether (and how) a party to a contract can “assign” (transfer) its rights, or pass on its obligations, under that contract, to another person.Essentially, novation and assignment are both mechanisms to get around this restriction. However, while the end result is the same, there are some important differences between these two mechanisms.
art
  • 05 March 2018
  • Corporate and M&A

The seven biggest threats to your business – and how to minimise them

Business owners face a host of risks, so you need to prepare for the worst.
art
  • 16 February 2018
  • Immigration

The Sponsorship Management System (SMS) for Beginners

Last month, we posted an article on the role of the Authorising Officer and explained that this person does not have access to the Sponsorship Management System (SMS) unless he/she is a Level 1 or 2 user.
art
  • 13 February 2018
  • Commercial Real Estate

Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards (MEES) – A guide for commercial buildings

From 1 April 2018 the Energy Efficiency (Private Rented property) (England and Wales) Regulations 2015 impose a new legal standard for minimum energy efficiency which will apply to rented commercial buildings. From this date it will be against the law for a landlord to grant a new lease of commercial property with an EPC Rating of F or G. This will also prevent the granting of new subleases and lease renewals.
art
  • 13 February 2018
  • Commercial Real Estate

Land Registry title to property mines and minerals

Mines and minerals are presumed to be included in the title register of land.
See More