Search

How can we help?

Icon

Beware all landowners! Be careful not to inadvertently grant a public right of way over your land.

The very real risk of an owner of land allowing rights of access over their land and then these leading to a dedicated public right of way was recently highlighted in the case of R v Cumbria County Council and Peter Lamb [2017] EWHC 2651.

It is therefore worth considering how the local authorities assess whether a public right of way has been established, to hopefully prevent landowners from suffering from this potential incumbrance on their land.

Local authorities are placed under a statutory duty (by Section 53 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981) to maintain a Definitive Map and Statement recording all public rights of way in their areas, and to continuously review the same. The Local authorities must update the Definitive Map where evidence is produced showing a previously unrecorded right.

How can rights arise?

New public rights of way can be created by grant, by order of a public authority or by specific dedication by the landowner.  Usually rights come about by presumed dedication. This arises where the public have been enjoying a route for a sufficient period of time, without challenge.

Section 31(1) of the Highways Act 1980 sets out the test to demonstrate a presumed dedication. It must be shown that:

  • The use has been such for a full period of 20 years without interruption.  For this purpose a single act of interruption by the landowner will be given more weight than many acts of enjoyment by the public;
  • The use has been without the landowner’s permission, secrecy or force;
  • The use has been by the public at large and not just a few people.  Use by a licensee or invitees of an adjacent owner will not be use by the public at large.  Similarly, use by certain tenants or employees is not adequate.
  • The right has been exercised over a defined route.

Local authorities are placed under a statutory duty (by Section 53 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981) to maintain a Definitive Map and Statement recording all public rights of way in their areas, and to continuously review the same.

How can a landowner seek to prevent a dedication?

It is always advisable to erect clearly visible notices citing the legislation and to generally prevent access to the public by locking entrances or installing other devices to block access. Landowners can also seek to close a private accessway for one or more days a year.

If it is accepted that some public rights of way exist but the landowner is keen to ensure no new rights are obtained then a landowner statement under section 31(6) of the Highways Act 1980 should be deposited with the Local Authority.  In effect this is a formal declaration that the landowner does not intend to dedicate any additional public rights of way.

The section 31(6) deposit means that any public use of the land within 20 years will not count towards the establishment of new rights of way.  The statement can then be renewed before the expiry of that 20 years and so on.

It is also worth remembering the importance of property due diligence when purchasing land to establish whether there are any existing potential public rights waiting to be dedicated. The seller of land should always provide replies to standard enquiries and these will specifically ask if the seller is aware of any such rights. It would also be advisable to inspect the land at all times of the day (before committing to a purchase) to see if there is any public use of it.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 23 July 2026
  • Immigration

New Priority Service for British citizenship applications: Faster decisions now available

The Home Office has introduced a new Priority Service for British citizenship applications, allowing eligible applicants to receive a decision on their naturalisation or registration application in around 30 working days, rather than waiting the standard processing time of up to six months.

Pub
  • 21 July 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Quarterly Insights: Key Corporate & Commercial Topics – Q3 2026

Join Stuart Mullins and Jonathan Hayes as they explore the most topical corporate and commercial issues, along with key developments our team has examined over the past three months. In Q3, they discuss CICs, company registers, and the use of NDAs in business sales and exits.

art
  • 20 July 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Personal Data FAQs

Explore comprehensive answers to frequently asked questions about personal data, GDPR compliance, and your rights.

art
  • 16 July 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

EMIs – The basics

Discover the essentials of Enterprise Management Incentives (EMIs), an HMRC-approved employee share scheme offering tax advantages. Learn how EMIs incentivise staff, eligibility requirements, and how Clarkslegal can help tailor a scheme for you.

Pub
  • 15 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

ICC Arbitration Rules 2026 overhaul: The end of Terms of Reference and future trends – Episode 3

In this final episode, Jack Hobbs (Clarkslegal) and Christopher Howitt (Three Stone) discuss the impact of the ICC Arbitration Rules 2026 overhaul, focusing on the end of Terms of Reference. Hear expert insights and practical tips for adapting to the new rules.

art
  • 15 July 2026
  • Employment

New guidance on interim relief: More applications, same high threshold

In certain limited unfair dismissal claims (such as those for automatic unfair dismissal relating to a protected disclosure) claimants can apply for interim relief. This is an emergency measure which essentially prevents a dismissal from taking effect until the claim has been heard.