Search

How can we help?

Icon

Restrictive covenants – employers watch out

Employers can be liable for inducing a breach of a restrictive covenant, but relying on legal advice can provide a defence as held the Court of Appeal in Allen v Dodd & Co Ltd.

Prior to employing Mr Pollock, Dodd and Co sought legal advice on his current employment contract with David Allen Chartered Accountants (‘Allen’), in particular his post-termination restrictions. The legal advice was that it was “more probable than not” that the restrictions would be unenforceable. Relying on this advice, Dodd and Co hired Mr Pollock.

Allen subsequently sought to enforce the post-termination restrictions in the High Court, which, after severing some words, held that the restrictions were enforceable against Mr Pollock. As part of their deliberations, the High Court considered whether Dodd and Co were liable for inducing the breach by Mr Pollock. It was held that they were not liable as “they did not turn a blind eye to the employee’s contractual obligations”. This was evidenced by the fact they had obtained legal advice.

Employers can be liable for inducing a breach of a restrictive covenant.

On appeal, Allen’s case was dismissed again. The Court of Appeal held that where “the defendant honestly believes that the act that he procures will not amount to a breach of contract, he is not liable”.  As Dodd and Co had relied honestly on their legal advice and that the advice did not definitively conclude that there would be a breach, they were not liable.

This is a very useful reminder that employers can be liable for inducing a breach of contract. Employers should take legal advice as early as possible in order to understand the risks of that accompany post-termination restrictions; this will help therefore mitigate any risk of inducement.

For more information on restrictive covenants, get in touch with our Employment department.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 12 September 2024
  • Privacy and Data Protection

2024 in review: tracking key data protection developments

As we approach the final quarter of 2024, it’s an opportune moment to revisit the data protection trends and developments that were anticipated at the end of 2023. Now, let’s see how those predictions have played out.

art
  • 10 September 2024
  • Employment

Sun, Fun and fairness – Amanda Glover writes for Business Voice magazine

Amanda Glover in Business Voice magazine discusses how employees at Harrods, the iconic luxury department store in London, are considering strike action over what the workers deem to be a discriminatory annual leave policy.

Pub
  • 06 September 2024
  • Corporate and M&A

How to exit your business – Reading Seminar

Due to popular demand, Nicky Goringe Larkin and Stuart Mullins, will be hosting a repeat of the ‘How to exit your business’ seminar at Clarkslegal’s Reading office.

Pub
  • 05 September 2024
  • Public Procurement

Public Procurement Annual Update 2024

The Procurement Act 2023 is coming into force on 28 October 2024, bringing with it major changes to public procurement procedures and legal remedies. Join our Public Procurement team as they provide you with the essential information you need to know.

art
  • 02 September 2024
  • Employment

Social Media – how private is your personal data

Nowadays most people have at least one social media account. Whether it’s Facebook or TikTok, X, or LinkedIn, most adults have an online presence.

art
  • 29 August 2024
  • Privacy and Data Protection

What a controller or a processor needs to know…in a nutshell

Data processing agreements are a common feature of contracts for the supply of services, for example often featuring as self-contained schedules to master services agreements.