Search

How can we help?

Icon

New requirements for companies to reveal pay ratio between bosses and workers

The government has announced a series of reforms aimed at increasing boardroom accountability and enhancing trust in business. These are a partial implementation of pledges in the Conservative manifesto for the May 2017 general election, which itself was much less alarming to businesses than Theresa May’s July 2016 Conservative party leadership campaign pledge to have employees represented on company boards.

The proposals are that, on an annual basis:

  • around 900 listed companies will have to publish and justify the pay ratio between CEOs and their average UK worker;
  • all companies of a significant size will have to publicly explain how their directors take employees’ and shareholders’ interests into account;
  • all large companies will have to make their responsible business arrangements public.

Around 900 listed companies will have to publish and justify the pay ratio between CEOs and their average UK worker

There will also be:

  • A public register where a fifth (20%) of investors in a listed company have objected to management annual pay awards;
  • measures seeking to ensure employees’ interests are better represented at board level – this would be done by asking the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) to introduce a new requirement in the UK Corporate Governance Code.

The code works on a “comply or explain basis.” Businesses would either have to assign a non-executive director to represent employees, create an employee advisory council, nominate a director from the workforce, or explain why they have not implemented any of the above measures. The government will also ask the FRC to develop a set of entirely voluntary corporate governance principles for large private companies.

The government intends to bring these legislative measures into effect by June 2018. However, due to present political uncertainty and competing priorities it would not be surprising if the proposed measures were shelved for the time being, or perhaps even indefinitely.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 23 October 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Section 172 Companies Act 2006: Key lessons from Saxon Woods v Costa

The Supreme Court’s decision in Saxon Woods v Costa UKSC 21 clarifies directors’ duties under Section 172 Companies Act 2006, confirming that good faith requires both honest belief and appropriate conduct.

art
  • 22 October 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Shareholders’ Agreements for Founders and Investors – SHA Series Part 3 of 5

A shareholders’ agreement is arguably one of the most valuable corporate governance agreements (along with articles of association) in any private UK company with more than one shareholder.

art
  • 19 October 2026
  • Immigration

Right to Work Checks: Are UK businesses becoming immigration enforcement officers?

The UK’s Right to Work regime has undergone a significant expansion, with changes taking effect from 1 October 2026.

art
  • 15 October 2026

Clarkslegal celebrates continued success in Chambers and Partners UK 2027

Clarkslegal is delighted to announce that we have once again been recognised by Chambers and Partners UK 2027, celebrating continued success across the firm and a number of enhanced individual rankings.

Pub
  • 15 October 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Data breaches and ICO investigations: Responding with confidence

In this podcast Harry Berryman and Zahra Navarro discuss recent ICO enforcement action, common causes of data breaches, and the practical steps organisations should take to respond effectively when incidents occur.

art
  • 14 October 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

London Court of International Arbitration v International Chamber of Commerce: Key differences

Compare LCIA and ICC arbitration rules, costs, confidentiality provisions and expedited procedures. Learn the key differences between these leading international arbitration institutions and how to choose the right option for your commercial dispute.