Search

How can we help?

Icon

Religiously motivated attacks on apprentice dismissed as ‘workplace pranks’ by perpetrators

A criminal trial is currently underway at York Crown Court in relation to attacks made on a young Christian apprentice by his colleagues while he was working for a shop-fitting firm, Direct Interior Solutions (DIS). 

The attacks took place on work premises and at other locations when the individuals were away on business.  They included burning the victim, drawing religious symbols on him in permanent marker and tying him to a wooden cross suspended in the air.  These attacks were dismissed by the perpetrators as “workplace pranks” and “banter”.

In this instance the individual made a complaint to the police, however, he could have also brought a claim against the individuals and DSI for religious discrimination in the Employment Tribunal.

Discrimination protection can extend to conduct outside the workplace, provided it takes place ‘in the course of employment’.  Further, it protects a wide range of individuals, not just employees, which includes apprentices.  DIS would have to show it took reasonable steps to prevent such discrimination occurring in order to avoid being vicariously liable for the acts of its employees.

Monica Atwal

Managing Partner

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

Chambers and Partners

The Clarkslegal team are commercial and good to work with. They get what our business needs and tell me what I need to hear.

Criminal acts do not negate vicarious liability, as we’ve seen from previous cases (see for example our previous blog on Mohamud v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc).  Employers need to ensure that they do all they can to prevent such acts occurring.  A clear anti-bullying policy and training to enforce this should be viewed as an absolute minimum.

Employmentbuddy.com 

About this article

Disclaimer

This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Monica Atwal

Managing Partner

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 13 February 2025
  • Public Procurement

Procurement Act 2023 – Coming into force on 24 February 2025

After a four-month delay from its original commencement date of 28 October 2024, the new Procurement Act 2023 is now due to come into force later this month on 24 February 2025.

art
  • 13 February 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

What are restrictive covenants and how do they relate to the planning system?

Restrictive covenants on use can be one of the more problematic aspects of a property transaction. Even if the restrictive covenants do not affect one’s development plans for the land, they may be an issue for subsequent buyers or future lenders.

art
  • 13 February 2025
  • Immigration

Skilled Worker New Entrant Exemption – is it a good investment?

The “new entrant” exemption under the UK Skilled Worker Visa is a vital but often underappreciated element of the immigration system. It offers valuable benefits to both employers and employees.

art
  • 12 February 2025
  • Employment

Balancing the Equality Act: Lessons from Higgs v Farmor’s School

The Court of Appeal have today issued a judgment in the Kristie Higgs v Farmor’s School case, in which it has ruled that the actions of the school in dismissing Ms Higgs for expressing LGBT+ critical posts on her personal Facebook account, was unlawful discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief.

Pub
  • 10 February 2025
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Frequently asked questions on data retention

In this podcast, Jesse Akiwumi and Harry Berryman, members of the Data Protection team at Clarkslegal, address the top frequently asked questions we receive about data retention.

art
  • 10 February 2025
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

We are living in a material world, but am I a material breach?

In this article we will be looking at the meaning of these different types of breach.