- 19 February 2016
When an employee is made redundant employers should if the employee has opted to be made redundant, as it may not mean the dismissal occured. In the case of Khan v HGS Global Ltd, the employment contract of an employee who had opted to take redundancy over relocating was found to have terminated by mutual consent and, as such, there had been no dismissal.
The employee worked for HGS Global. His employment was due to transfer to another company under TUPE, however, this company was based some distance away. In light of the extra travel time that would be involved in working for the new company, HGS Global gave the employee three options. He could relocate, apply for alternative roles with HGS Global or opt for redundancy. He opted for redundancy.
The employee subsequently sought to bring a claim for unfair dismissal, however, the Tribunal held that there had been no dismissal and that the contract had terminated by mutual consent (a decision upheld by the EAT on appeal).
The Tribunal was confident that the employee understood that he was being given a choice, that he had been repeatedly advised of his options (which were presented in a neutral way) and was not being pressurised or pushed in any particular direction. In reaching its decision the Tribunal was also mindful that there would not have been any dismissals had the employees not opted for redundancy.
Further, the new company had not considered the extra distance to be ‘unreasonable’ and thus redundancy had only been offered by HGS Global as a result of employees’ concerns over the extra distance.
Chambers and Partners
The Clarkslegal team are commercial and good to work with. They get what our business needs and tell me what I need to hear.
Tribunals will look at the reality of the situation to determine if an employee has been dismissed and that the label of redundancy will not always mean that a dismissal has occurred.
However, employers should approach the decision with caution as it is not intended to cover employees who volunteer for redundancy and the facts of this case are unlikely to be those which arise in the majority of redundancy situations. It is also worth noting that the employee here could have sought to argue that the new journey time was a substantial change to his terms and conditions to his material detriment which, under TUPE, can amount to a dismissal.
Redundancy and reorganisation situations can be difficult for all those involved. Our employment solicitors offer clear and timely tailor-made advice to guide you through the process, contact our employment lawyers for further advice.
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.
About this article
SubjectRedundancy was not a dismissal
Published19 February 2016
Read, listen and watch our latest insights
- 08 December 2023
UK Hospitality – Right to Work
The UK’s hospitality sector is strongly impacted by immigration rules and policies post-Brexit.
- 04 December 2023
- Commercial Real Estate
Real Estate update and 2024 expectations
The ECC confers rights on code operators to install and maintain electronic communications apparatus on public land, and even grants operators the right to sometimes apply to court for an order allowing them to install and maintain such apparatus on private land.
- 29 November 2023
How will the Autumn Statement 2023 affect the Construction Industry?
On 22 November 2023 Parliament was presented with the Chancellor’s Autumn Statement.
- 29 November 2023
- Public Procurement
Public Procurement Annual Update 2023
Watch Clarkslegal’s Public Procurement team as they provide you with the essential information businesses involved in public tenders need to know.
- 28 November 2023
The risk of insolvency with equal pay claims: how can you avoid them?
Even though the law states that everyone should be paid equally for work of comparable value, this does not always happen in practice.
- 21 November 2023
- Privacy and Data Protection
Privacy matters: How the 8 data subject rights protect personal data
In this guide we explore the 8 data subject rights under the UK GDPR and discover how they play a vital role in preserving your organisation’s privacy standards in an increasingly interconnected world.