Search

How can we help?

Icon

Taking steps to avoid or reduce the impact of discrimination

When a discrimination claim is successful, as well as being able to order compensation for injury to feelings and financial losses, employment tribunals have the power to make a recommendation that, within a specified period, the employer take specific steps to avoid or reduce the impact of the discrimination. A common example is a recommendation that the employer provide an agreed reference.

Tribunals should not usually recommend that a victim of discrimination should have their pay increased or that they should be awarded a new contract because losses arising from discrimination should be dealt with by way of compensation.

This has led many businesses, when faced with a discrimination claim, to think that recommendations do not have a direct financial consequence. However, as the case of Hill v Lloyds Bank shows, this is not accurate.

In this case, the Employment Appeal Tribunal decided that a recommendation can include making an employer undertake to pay a redundancy payment to someone who is not redundant.

The claimant, in this case suffered with depression, allegedly caused by bullying and harassment by two colleagues. When she returned from sick leave, she asked her employer to guarantee that either she would not be required to work with them or that she would receive severance equivalent to an enhanced redundancy payment.

The employer did not give this guarantee and the claimant brought a claim for disability discrimination on the basis that this was a failure to make reasonable adjustments.

The tribunal and the EAT agreed that the employer’s practice was not to give such promises and this had put the claimant at a substantial disadvantage compared to a non-disabled person because it caused her anxiety and fear. The finding was that giving the claimant the guarantee she had requested would have reduced that fear and it would have been reasonable for the employer to do so.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal decided that a recommendation can include making an employer undertake to pay a redundancy payment to someone who is not redundant.

There were issues with the recommendation and the matter has been remitted back to the Tribunal to consider.  However, the EAT held that, as a matter of principle, the law did not prevent the tribunal from making a recommendation requiring the employer to give such a written undertaking.

For advice on the full ramifications of allegations of discrimination at work, contact our discrimination lawyers.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 15 September 2025
  • Immigration

Sharp rise in Sponsor Licence Revocations – What employers need to know

The Home Office has reported a record number of sponsor licence revocations over the past year, as part of its intensified efforts to crack down on abuse of the UK’s immigration system.

art
  • 10 September 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

Trouble at the Table: The Challenges Facing the UK Hospitality Sector in the run up to Christmas 2025

The UK hospitality sector, long celebrated for its vibrancy and resilience, is facing a perfect storm of economic, operational, and structural challenges in 2025.

art
  • 09 September 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

Le bail commercial anglais: quelques points essentiels à considérer

Typiquement, les baux commerciaux en Angleterre sont de court terme, d’une durée de 5 ou 10 ans, avec un loyer de marché et des ajustements du loyer périodiques en fonction de l’inflation ou d’autres facteurs. 

art
  • 09 September 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

The Failure to Prevent Fraud Offence – be prepared to avoid criminal liability

The failure to prevent fraud offence is a new corporate offence which has come into force on 1 September 2025.

art
  • 08 September 2025
  • Employment

Can employers still make changes to contracts after the Employment Rights Bill?

The short answer is yes but it will be much more difficult for employers following the introduction of the Employment Rights Bill because their ability to fairly dismiss employees who do not agree contractual changes is being restricted. 

art
  • 05 September 2025
  • Privacy and Data Protection

When Ignoring a DSAR Becomes a Criminal Offence

On 3 September 2025, Mr Jason Blake appeared at Beverley Magistrates Court and was fined for failing to respond to a data subject access request (DSAR).