Search

How can we help?

Icon

Taking steps to avoid or reduce the impact of discrimination

When a discrimination claim is successful, as well as being able to order compensation for injury to feelings and financial losses, employment tribunals have the power to make a recommendation that, within a specified period, the employer take specific steps to avoid or reduce the impact of the discrimination. A common example is a recommendation that the employer provide an agreed reference.

Tribunals should not usually recommend that a victim of discrimination should have their pay increased or that they should be awarded a new contract because losses arising from discrimination should be dealt with by way of compensation.

This has led many businesses, when faced with a discrimination claim, to think that recommendations do not have a direct financial consequence. However, as the case of Hill v Lloyds Bank shows, this is not accurate.

In this case, the Employment Appeal Tribunal decided that a recommendation can include making an employer undertake to pay a redundancy payment to someone who is not redundant.

The claimant, in this case suffered with depression, allegedly caused by bullying and harassment by two colleagues. When she returned from sick leave, she asked her employer to guarantee that either she would not be required to work with them or that she would receive severance equivalent to an enhanced redundancy payment.

The employer did not give this guarantee and the claimant brought a claim for disability discrimination on the basis that this was a failure to make reasonable adjustments.

The tribunal and the EAT agreed that the employer’s practice was not to give such promises and this had put the claimant at a substantial disadvantage compared to a non-disabled person because it caused her anxiety and fear. The finding was that giving the claimant the guarantee she had requested would have reduced that fear and it would have been reasonable for the employer to do so.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal decided that a recommendation can include making an employer undertake to pay a redundancy payment to someone who is not redundant.

There were issues with the recommendation and the matter has been remitted back to the Tribunal to consider.  However, the EAT held that, as a matter of principle, the law did not prevent the tribunal from making a recommendation requiring the employer to give such a written undertaking.

For advice on the full ramifications of allegations of discrimination at work, contact our discrimination lawyers.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 29 July 2026
  • Employment

Employment Rights Act 2025: Key takeaways from the Consultation for Zero Hour Reforms

The government published its consultation on reform of zero hour, low hour and agency worker contracts on 2nd June 2026. The consultation closes on 25 August 2026 and so there is still time to get responses in to help shape the operation of the new provisions in the Employment Rights Act 2025 (the “Act”).

art
  • 27 July 2026
  • Commercial Real Estate

What every business should know about commercial leases

Understand the key commercial lease clauses that can affect your business, including break clauses, security of tenure, repairs, alterations, rent reviews and assignment rights. Learn what tenants and landlords should consider when negotiating lease terms.

art
  • 23 July 2026
  • Immigration

New Priority Service for British citizenship applications: Faster decisions now available

The Home Office has introduced a new Priority Service for British citizenship applications, allowing eligible applicants to receive a decision on their naturalisation or registration application in around 30 working days, rather than waiting the standard processing time of up to six months.

Pub
  • 21 July 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Quarterly Insights: Key Corporate & Commercial Topics – Q3 2026

Join Stuart Mullins and Jonathan Hayes as they explore the most topical corporate and commercial issues, along with key developments our team has examined over the past three months. In Q3, they discuss CICs, company registers, and the use of NDAs in business sales and exits.

art
  • 20 July 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Personal Data FAQs

Explore comprehensive answers to frequently asked questions about personal data, GDPR compliance, and your rights.

art
  • 16 July 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

EMIs – The basics

Discover the essentials of Enterprise Management Incentives (EMIs), an HMRC-approved employee share scheme offering tax advantages. Learn how EMIs incentivise staff, eligibility requirements, and how Clarkslegal can help tailor a scheme for you.