Search

How can we help?

Icon

‘Quiet Quitting’ and ‘Loud Quitting’: Are working practises being reset?

Last Autumn, we reported on how the controversial practises of ‘quiet quitting’ and ‘loud quitting’ in the workplace were hitting the headlines. However, we have recently noticed how employee-driven learning and development tools are being used to reverse quiet quitting and loud quitting.

What are ‘quiet quitting’ and ‘loud quitting’ in the workplace?

‘Quiet quitting’ is an application of work-to-rule, where employees work defined hours and make a discretionary decision to do what they need to get done and not work longer hours or outside the boundaries of the job requirements. This attitudinal shift seems to have resulted from employees being or feeling overworked over the past 2 years throughout the Pandemic, particularly where employees have reflected on their changing priorities and aspirations for a better work-life balance, whilst seeking to avoid burnout.

Whereas ‘loud quitting’ is where employees raise concerns with their managers and informing their colleagues of their intentions. Currently, we are witnessing this on a large-scale basis in the form of industrial action.

What is being done to reverse such practises?

A key aspect that has arisen in the last few months is that many employees are reflecting on their jobs and wanting greater opportunities to learn, grow and practice new skills to develop their career. There are now an increasing number of technological platforms for employees to develop their skills to enable a tailor-made approach to their career.

Since the pandemic and the new ways of working, in particular in a hybrid setting, there has been  a focus on creating learning programmes that encompass team elements in the hope of rebuilding connections and cohesiveness.

It is clear that, generally, employees are looking for more than just undertaking the day-to-day role but are seeking new opportunities and skills to develop to the next stage of their career.

‘Quiet quitting’ is an application of work-to-rule, where employees work defined hours and make a discretionary decision to do what they need to get done and not work longer hours or outside the boundaries of the job requirements.

So what can employers do?

It is clear that employee engagement is a key factor to rebuild the mutual trust of understanding and employers may seek to do this in the following ways:

  • Communicating with each other to better understand their concerns and encourage employees to speak openly if they have concerns in the role.
  • Providing job descriptions to employees from the outset so that they are aware of the parameters of the role and skills required to undertake the role.
  • Undertaking regular performance reviews so that it can be identified what an employee has done well and what can be improved (and communicating this to the employee). It is also an opportunity to discuss if an employee has taken on any additional responsibilities or work to understand if this justifies a promotion or salary review.
  • Reviewing and updating employee handbooks so that employees are aware of the expected standards at work and to ensure compliance with the current legislation.
  • Prioritising learning and promoting employees’ development in existing and new skills and experience.

Overall, open and genuine communication between employee and employer is key to ensuring that both understand their respective positions and seeing if there is a way forward for the employee to remain motivated in the role before key talent is lost.

If you require further advice on this topic, please do not hesitate to contact a member of our employment lawyers for employers.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 19 August 2026
  • Employment

Managing employee redundancies: Frequently asked questions (FAQs)

Redundancy should be an employer’s last option when restructuring their business. There are necessary steps that should be taken to ensure that redundancy is the best move forward

art
  • 13 August 2026
  • Employment

ACAS Draft New Code on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures

ACAS have published a draft Code on 30 July 2026, which will replace the 2015 ACAS Code on disciplinary and grievance procedures when the Code is finalised at the end of September 2026.

Pub
  • 06 August 2026
  • Employment

Employment law changes in 2026: What you need to know

With ongoing changes to UK employment law, staying updated is more challenging than ever. Join Monica Atwal and Harry Berryman for a live webinar covering 2026 HR changes and key employment law updates on Thursday 17 September.

Pub
  • 04 August 2026
  • Employment

From Opportunity to Employment: Building Inclusive Workplaces Together | Hosted by Breakthrough Supported Employment

Join Breakthrough Supported Employment for a live seminar on building inclusive workplaces at Malmaison Reading. Clarkslegal’s Lucy White will speak alongside industry experts, sharing insights on fostering diversity and creating equitable opportunities.

art
  • 29 July 2026
  • Employment

Employment Rights Act 2025: Key takeaways from the Consultation for Zero Hour Reforms

The government published its consultation on reform of zero hour, low hour and agency worker contracts on 2nd June 2026. The consultation closes on 25 August 2026 and so there is still time to get responses in to help shape the operation of the new provisions in the Employment Rights Act 2025 (the “Act”).

art
  • 15 July 2026
  • Employment

New guidance on interim relief: More applications, same high threshold

In certain limited unfair dismissal claims (such as those for automatic unfair dismissal relating to a protected disclosure) claimants can apply for interim relief. This is an emergency measure which essentially prevents a dismissal from taking effect until the claim has been heard.