Search

How can we help?

Icon

‘Quiet Quitting’ and ‘Loud Quitting’: Are working practises being reset?

Last Autumn, we reported on how the controversial practises of ‘quiet quitting’ and ‘loud quitting’ in the workplace were hitting the headlines. However, we have recently noticed how employee-driven learning and development tools are being used to reverse quiet quitting and loud quitting.

What are ‘quiet quitting’ and ‘loud quitting’ in the workplace?

‘Quiet quitting’ is an application of work-to-rule, where employees work defined hours and make a discretionary decision to do what they need to get done and not work longer hours or outside the boundaries of the job requirements. This attitudinal shift seems to have resulted from employees being or feeling overworked over the past 2 years throughout the Pandemic, particularly where employees have reflected on their changing priorities and aspirations for a better work-life balance, whilst seeking to avoid burnout.

Whereas ‘loud quitting’ is where employees raise concerns with their managers and informing their colleagues of their intentions. Currently, we are witnessing this on a large-scale basis in the form of industrial action.

What is being done to reverse such practises?

A key aspect that has arisen in the last few months is that many employees are reflecting on their jobs and wanting greater opportunities to learn, grow and practice new skills to develop their career. There are now an increasing number of technological platforms for employees to develop their skills to enable a tailor-made approach to their career.

Since the pandemic and the new ways of working, in particular in a hybrid setting, there has been  a focus on creating learning programmes that encompass team elements in the hope of rebuilding connections and cohesiveness.

It is clear that, generally, employees are looking for more than just undertaking the day-to-day role but are seeking new opportunities and skills to develop to the next stage of their career.

Melanie Pimenta

Associate

View profile

+44 118 960 4653

‘Quiet quitting’ is an application of work-to-rule, where employees work defined hours and make a discretionary decision to do what they need to get done and not work longer hours or outside the boundaries of the job requirements.

So what can employers do?

It is clear that employee engagement is a key factor to rebuild the mutual trust of understanding and employers may seek to do this in the following ways:

  • Communicating with each other to better understand their concerns and encourage employees to speak openly if they have concerns in the role.
  • Providing job descriptions to employees from the outset so that they are aware of the parameters of the role and skills required to undertake the role.
  • Undertaking regular performance reviews so that it can be identified what an employee has done well and what can be improved (and communicating this to the employee). It is also an opportunity to discuss if an employee has taken on any additional responsibilities or work to understand if this justifies a promotion or salary review.
  • Reviewing and updating employee handbooks so that employees are aware of the expected standards at work and to ensure compliance with the current legislation.
  • Prioritising learning and promoting employees’ development in existing and new skills and experience.

Overall, open and genuine communication between employee and employer is key to ensuring that both understand their respective positions and seeing if there is a way forward for the employee to remain motivated in the role before key talent is lost.

If you require further advice on this topic, please do not hesitate to contact a member of our employment lawyers for employers.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Melanie Pimenta

Associate

View profile

+44 118 960 4653

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 16 May 2025
  • Employment

London Seminar – Understanding the Employment Rights Bill: Legal changes and what they mean for HR

We are pleased to invite you to an in-person seminar at our London office on Tuesday 24th June, hosted by our Employment Law team. Join Monica Atwal, Managing Partner; Katie Glendinning, Partner; and Amanda Glover, Associate, as they unpack the legal implications of the new Employment Rights Bill and what it means for your organisation.

Pub
  • 16 May 2025
  • Employment

Reading Seminar – Understanding the Employment Rights Bill: Legal changes and what they mean for HR

We are pleased to invite you to an in-person seminar at our Reading office Tuesday 17th June hosted by our Employment Law team. Join Monica Atwal, Managing Partner, Katie Glendinning, Partner and Amanda Glover, Associate, will unpack the legal implications of the new Employment Rights Bill and what it means for your organisation.

Pub
  • 15 May 2025
  • Employment

TUPE Podcast Series – Information and Consultation Obligations

In this ninth episode of our TUPE Podcast Series, Katie Glendinning, a Partner in the employment team, will examine the information and consultation obligations under TUPE.

Pub
  • 12 May 2025
  • Employment

Talking Employment Law: The Employment Rights Bill – Part 2

In part two of the Employment Rights Bill podcast series, Louise Keenan and Melanie Pimenta, members of the employment team, will discuss changes to collective redundancies, flexible working and sick pay.

art
  • 08 May 2025
  • Employment

Statutory Sick Pay Scheme changes: how can employers prepare for such changes?

The government has recently changed the Statutory Sick Pay provisions; it is anticipated that such changes will ‘help people to stay in work and grow the economy’.

art
  • 02 May 2025
  • Employment

Sex, Gender and the Law: What the Supreme Court’s Recent Ruling Means for Employers

The recent UK Supreme Court decision in For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers  UKSC 16 has generated significant attention, but for most employers, we would argue that its practical impact is relatively limited—at least for now.