Search

How can we help?

Icon

Public Procurement – What happens after Brexit?

It seems a long time ago we were being told during the Brexit referendum that leaving the EU would save us £1.6 billion a year in procurement costs. Since then the UK has left the EU but still remains signed up to the EU public procurement rules until 11pm on 31 December 2020. What happens next depends in part on the outcome of the EU/UK trade negotiations but also on the broader question of how the UK wants to run public procurement.

Very little information about public procurement has emerged during the Brexit trade negotiations. Unlike tariffs, fishing and state aid, procurement itself has hardly been mentioned. If we end up with no deal, we know that the UK will fall back on its membership of the WTO’s Government Procurement Agreement (‘GPA’), which will give UK businesses continued access to some EU public contracts. But it will not be the access currently enjoyed, as explained in our briefing on the UK’s accession to the GPA for further details.

We also know the EU is looking for a procurement deal which goes beyond the commitments in the GPA. That is hardly surprising given the size and attractiveness of the UK procurement market to EU businesses.

In contrast, the draft Free Trade Agreement proposed by the UK does not include procurement at all, suggesting the UK are happy for the future EU/UK procurement relationship to be based solely on the GPA. No doubt that is part of the UK’s negotiating position and greater access to the respective procurement markets will be granted, along with a tariff-free deal, if the larger obstacles to a trade deal can be overcome.

Even if a procurement deal can be agreed, we can be reasonably confident the UK will not agree to maintain the EU procurement rules indefinitely. Conservative politicians and advisers have lined up to criticise these rules as overly bureaucratic, expensive, wasteful and poor at delivering results. Whether those criticisms are justified is debatable and many will recall the UK had a close hand in drawing up the EU rules in the first place. It is clear, however, that the rules will eventually change but, to what, remains unknown.

So far the UK government has only enacted very modest changes to the procurement regulations following Brexit. Largely the changes are technical to ensure the regulations are consistent with the UK’s status as a former EU Member State.

References to the European Commission having any say in UK procurement have been removed as have the rights of EU businesses to bid for UK contracts outside of the GPA. And the UK government has introduced a new electronic system for advertising tenders and publishing awards to apply in place of OJEU, to be called ‘Find a Tender’. Besides that, nothing of substance will change immediately post-Brexit to the way UK public bodies across the UK have to run tenders and evaluate bids.

Back in 2019 the UK Cabinet Office announced the establishment of ‘the Procurement Transformation Advisory Body’ to advise the government on potential proposals for reforming UK public procurement.

As far as we are aware, neither the government nor the Procurement Transformation Advisory Body has published any details of what those proposals might be. On 4 November 2020, Dan Carden MP made a written request to the Cabinet Office to publish the agendas and minutes of the Procurement Transformation Advisory Panel’s meetings. Unfortunately, that request was rejected, with the Cabinet Office stating that the ‘practice of successive administrations’ was not normally to disclose these details.

As with much of Brexit, little can be said with certainty at present. The expectation is that the UK government will at some point publish a Green Paper on the future of public procurement in the UK although there is no timeline for this happening. Until then, the most we can report is that nothing is likely to change in the very short-term post Brexit besides what is outlined above.

What happens next depends in part on the outcome of the EU/UK trade negotiations but also on the broader question of how the UK wants to run public procurement.

Each of these promise some improvement to the current procurement rules. Whether the UK will truly be able to revolutionise procurement to deliver the type of transformative efficiencies and value for money on public projects that politicians talk of is yet to be seen.

We will be publishing further updates on the future of public procurement in the UK as the position becomes clearer.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 09 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

The Arbitration Act 2025 – Factsheet

This factsheet outlines the major reforms and key developments introduced by the Arbitration Act 2025, including updates on summary disposal, jurisdictional challenges, emergency arbitrators, arbitrator disclosure duties, and governing law in arbitration proceedings.

art
  • 09 July 2026
  • Immigration

Right to Work Checks are changing from 1 October 2026: Is your business ready?

The Home Office’s new rules, effective 1 October 2026, will overhaul right to work checks and raise the risk of civil penalties for UK businesses.

art
  • 08 July 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

ICO prosecutes employee under the Data Protection Act for forwarding client data to his personal email address

The issue of employees taking confidential business information or personal data when moving to a new employer remains a significant concern for businesses.

Pub
  • 07 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Accelerating arbitration: Expedited procedures and key changes in the new ICC Rules – Episode 2

In episode 2, Jack Hobbs (Clarkslegal) and Christopher Howitt (Three Stone) explore how the latest expedited and highly expedited procedures under the ICC Arbitration Rules 2026 are transforming the landscape of dispute resolution.

art
  • 07 July 2026
  • Employment

6 month unfair dismissal rights: What employers need to know

Under the new Employment Rights Act 2025 the minimum period of service required to qualify to bring a statutory claim for unfair dismissal has been reduced from 2 full years to 6 months from 1 January 2027 onwards.  

art
  • 02 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Litigation and Artificial Intelligence: Where are we now?

In the recent case of Cork and another v Smith, the High Court publicly admonished a law firm and two of its solicitors after they had produced and submitted two AI-generated letters to the court containing misleading and false information in relation to a block transfer application made under Rule 12.37 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016.