Search

How can we help?

Icon

Enhance redundancy protections for pregnant women and new parents

It is estimated that up to 54,000 women a year lose their jobs as a result of pregnancy or maternity discrimination with 37% of women feeling isolated to the point of resignation following a return from maternity leave.

The law already specifically protects employees from unfavourable treatment because they are pregnant or on maternity leave, at any time from the beginning of the pregnancy to their return to work after maternity leave.

It is also a legal requirement to give women who are on maternity leave who are at risk of redundancy priority over other employees in the same situation. Under Regulation 10(3) Maternity and Parental Leave etc Regulations 1999, if a redundancy situation arises during an employee’s maternity leave and “it is not practicable by reason of redundancy” for the employer to continue to employ her under her existing contract, employers have an obligation to offer a suitable alternative vacancy where one is available. For example, if a restructure means that there will be a reduction from 8 substantially similar roles to 4 suitable alternative roles, any of the 8 affected employees who are on maternity leave have to be offered one of the new roles rather than being placed in a redundancy selection pool.

This redundancy protection currently only applies while an employee is on maternity leave. The government has now committed to extending this period so that it starts when the employee informs the employer, whether orally or in writing, that she is pregnant and continues for six months after the end of maternity leave.

The government will extend the same additional six months of redundancy protection for those returning to work after adoption leave. It also intends to extend some redundancy protection for those returning to work after shared parental leave but the details have not been confirmed. This may be more limited protection and/or for a shorter period of time.

A task force of employer and family representative groups will also be established by the government. It will be important for employers to contribute to this because this task force will develop an action plan on what steps government and other organisations should take.

These developments can be expected to improve the overall rates of pregnant women and new mothers staying in work. It will be crucial for HR professionals to ensure they are fully aware of these new requirements in order to avoid discrimination claims. No date has yet been announced for these changes to come into force but it is sensible to expect that this will happen in early 2020.

However, these changes are unlikely to mark a sea change in retention of women in the workforce.

One obvious change which is not included in these reforms relates to paternity pay and leave. While accurate figures are hard to come by, it is likely that the full 2 weeks of statutory paternity leave is only taken by around half of those entitled to it. The most obvious exhalation for this is that statutory paternity pay is set at £148.68 (or 90% of the employee’s average weekly earnings if this figure is less than the statutory rate).

There are of course perfectly good reasons – the protection of the health of women who have just given birth – why the first two weeks of maternity leave are compulsory while paternity leave is optional. It is also valid that it is not discriminatory not to extend the legal rights and protections which apply to pregnant women and those on, or returning from, maternity leave to those taking paternity leave:  paternity leave is a shorter period of time out of the workplace.

In addition, it is not realistic or appropriate to think that regulation of the employment relationship is the way to remove gender biased assumptions about parenting. However, it is not helpful if the law reinforces these assumptions: in particular, the assumption often made by employers of new parents as to which parent will be the primary caregiver.

The government will extend the same additional six months of redundancy protection for those returning to work after adoption leave.

With that in mind, one change the government could make would be to increase statutory paternity pay to 90% of average weekly earnings. It is worth remembering that small employers are entitled to recover 100% of statutory maternity or paternity pay from HMRC, and large employers are to recover 92%.

If this had the effect of increasing the numbers of men taking two weeks’ paternity leave, it should also result in fewer women being held back in their careers as a result of becoming parents.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

Caroline Lendrum

Associate

View profile

+44 118 960 4669

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 02 April 2026
  • Commercial Real Estate

Can I have access to a neighbour’s land to carry out works to my property?

As a landowner, maintaining and repairing your property is important. It may be the case that to do so, you will need to access the land of a neighbour.

art
  • 01 April 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Recognising DSARs: top tips for organisations

The UK GDPR grants Data Subjects, who are the individuals to whom the personal data relates, rights over their personal data, including the rights of access, correction and erasure.

art
  • 30 March 2026
  • Employment

Legislative Changes – What Employers Need to Know for April 2026

With the phased implementation of the Employment Rights Act 2025 (ERA), alongside other legislative updates, April 2026 brings a wide range of important changes for employers.

Pub
  • 27 March 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Shareholder Disputes: What to do when disputes arise – Episode 4

Join Stuart Mullins and Jack Hobbs for episode four of our Shareholder Disputes podcast series as they confront the realities of shareholder fallouts and share practical strategies for managing these complex situations.

art
  • 24 March 2026
  • Immigration

Spouse Visa – Is your relationship genuine and subsisting?

For years many couples have become frustrated by the requirements for a spouse visa as the rules and guidance are difficult to understand. A significant amount of applications are rejected on the basis of the applicant not providing the adequate documents to evidence the relationship requirement.

art
  • 20 March 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Drag-Along & Tag-Along Rights: Why Every Company Needs Them

When starting a company, very few founders are aware of the potential issues around shares, share ownership and the implications of that when selling their company.